Less than a half of patients with ICH survive 1 year and less than a third survive 5 years. Risks of recurrent ICH and ischaemic stroke after ICH appear similar after ICH, provoking uncertainties about the use of antithrombotic drugs.
Background Patients with stroke due to spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) are at risk of recurrent ICH, ischaemic stroke, and other serious vascular events. We aimed to analyse these risks in population-based studies and compare them with the risks in RESTART, which assessed antiplatelet therapy after ICH.Methods We pooled individual patient data from two prospective, population-based inception cohort studies of all patients with an incident firs-in-a-lifetime
ObjectivesExternal ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is a common neurosurgical procedure. EVD-related infection (ERI) is a major complication that can lead to morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to establish a national ERI rate in the UK and Ireland and determine key factors influencing the infection risk.MethodsA prospective multicentre cohort study of EVD insertions in 21 neurosurgical units was performed over 6 months. The primary outcome measure was 30-day ERI. A Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis to calculate HR.ResultsA total of 495 EVD catheters were inserted into 452 patients with EVDs remaining in situ for 4700 days (median 8 days; IQR 4–13). Of the catheters inserted, 188 (38%) were antibiotic-impregnated, 161 (32.5%) were plain and 146 (29.5%) were silver-bearing. A total of 46 ERIs occurred giving an infection risk of 9.3%. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that factors independently associated with increased infection risk included duration of EVD placement for ≥8 days (HR=2.47 (1.12–5.45); p=0.03), regular sampling (daily sampling (HR=4.73 (1.28–17.42), p=0.02) and alternate day sampling (HR=5.28 (2.25–12.38); p<0.01). There was no association between catheter type or tunnelling distance and ERI.ConclusionsIn the UK and Ireland, the ERI rate was 9.3% during the study period. The study demonstrated that EVDs left in situ for ≥8 days and those sampled more frequently were associated with a higher risk of infection. Importantly, the study showed no significant difference in ERI risk between different catheter types.
Studies directly comparing the outcomes of intracranial meningioma resection between elderly and younger patients are currently limited. This study aimed to assess the perioperative complications, mortalities and functional outcomes in these two groups. Consecutive elderly patients (aged ≥ 65) and tumor-location-matched younger patients who underwent intracranial meningioma resections were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes were assessed at 30-day, 90-day, 6-month and 1-year. We used a standardized classification of operative complications, and conducted subgroup analyses based on tumor location [convexity, parasagittal and falcine (CPF) as one group; skull base (SB) as another]. There were 92 patients in each group. The mean age was 74.6 ± 6.4 years in the elderly and 49.3 ± 10.1 years in the younger groups. The cumulative 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality rates were 0, 2.2 and 4.3 % for the elderly, respectively, and 1.1 % for all time points in the young. These differences were not statistically significant. Overall, the elderly suffered from more perioperative complications (P = 0.010), and these were mostly minor complications according to the classification of operative complications. However, these differences were observed only in the SB but not in the CPF subgroup. More elderly patients had impaired functional outcome 1-year after surgery. Significantly more elderly patients had new neurological deficits 1-year after surgery (26.1 vs. 6.6 %; P = 0.001). Comparable mortality rates were observed in elderly and younger patients. However, the elderly had more minor complications and poorer functional outcomes. Patient selection remains key to good clinical outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.