2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02032.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying the fire‐response traits of plants: How reliable are species‐level classifications?

Abstract: Plant species in fire-prone environments possess specific traits which allow them to survive fire. Species are commonly classified according to whether they survive fire and resprout or whether they are killed by fire and regenerate from seed. However, different populations of the same species have been shown to vary in their responses. Therefore, the classification of a species into a single category based on fire-response traits may not necessarily be representative of every population under every circumstan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the outset, we acknowledge that populations of various taxa may exhibit some degree of variability (both genetic and environmental) with respect to fire response, time to first seeding, and seedbank longevity traits (Vivian et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the outset, we acknowledge that populations of various taxa may exhibit some degree of variability (both genetic and environmental) with respect to fire response, time to first seeding, and seedbank longevity traits (Vivian et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the overall high survival observed in this study, high post-fire survival and resprouting has been reported in previous studies of remnant grassy woodlands (Knox & Clarke 2004). Vivian et al 2010) or reduced mortality as a result of small-scale variation in fire intensity (Gill 1981) may have contributed to high survival of species classified as obligate seeders. Contrary to expectations, obligate seeders showed similar survival in burnt and unburnt sites for tubestock and remnant woodlands.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within-species variation in fire response (e.g. Vivian et al 2010) or reduced mortality as a result of small-scale variation in fire intensity (Gill 1981) may have contributed to high survival of species classified as obligate seeders. In addition, the low survival of individual Acacia plants that could not be identified to the species level may have inflated the survival of obligate seeders in revegetation sites.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unwise to burn most Australian heaths at an interval of less than 8-10 years because of the potential loss of obligate seed regenerators (Bradstock and Myerscough 1981;Bradstock et al 1997;Gill and Stephens 2009), however, our results strongly suggest that too frequent fire is currently not a problem, and that more frequent planned burning should be undertaken in the coastal heathlands of south-eastern Tasmania. Furthermore, since different populations of the same species can vary in their capacity to resprout or regenerate from seed after fire, it may be more useful to consider the fire response at a population level, rather than considering species response traits individually (Vivian et al 2010). Burning should take place before heath turns into scrub, as burning after this transition may fail to regenerate a substantial subset of native species, and merely reinforce the dominance of the species constituting the scrub.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%