2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02404.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post‐fire recovery of revegetated woodland communities in south‐eastern Australia

Abstract: The primary goal of restoration is to create self-sustaining ecological communities that are resilient to periodic disturbance. Currently, little is known about how restored communities respond to disturbance events such as fire and how this response compares to remnant vegetation. Following the 2003 fires in south-eastern Australia we examined the post-fire response of revegetation plantings and compared this to remnant vegetation. Ten burnt and 10 unburnt (control) sites were assessed for each of three types… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corresponding estimates for fire-induced whole-plant mortality were 44% overall, 25% for eucalypts and 33% for acacias. This value for eucalypts is considerably higher than the 0-5% reported for dry forests in several other studies (Potts 1986;Wardell-Johnson 2000;Croft et al 2007;Pickup et al 2013), and higher than the 15% reported for evergreen eucalypts in a northern Australian savanna as a result of an unusually severe fire (Williams et al 1999). Although fire appeared to have little impact on eucalypt survival at some sites, at two sites, fewer than 10% of eucalypt stems were alive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corresponding estimates for fire-induced whole-plant mortality were 44% overall, 25% for eucalypts and 33% for acacias. This value for eucalypts is considerably higher than the 0-5% reported for dry forests in several other studies (Potts 1986;Wardell-Johnson 2000;Croft et al 2007;Pickup et al 2013), and higher than the 15% reported for evergreen eucalypts in a northern Australian savanna as a result of an unusually severe fire (Williams et al 1999). Although fire appeared to have little impact on eucalypt survival at some sites, at two sites, fewer than 10% of eucalypt stems were alive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, surprisingly few studies have quantified the mortality and resprouting responses of trees after fire in these forests (Fairman et al 2015). Survival of eucalypts has been reported as being similar to, or only slightly lower (<5%), in recently burnt than in long-unburnt dry eucalypt forests (Potts 1986;Wardell-Johnson 2000;Croft et al 2007;Pickup et al 2013). Gill (1978) measured the impact of fire on small Eucalyptus dives trees in south-eastern New South Wales; all survived the fire, but lost 30-50% of their initial height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some Acacia species in the plantings (e.g., Acacia dealbata) recruited prolifically from root suckers during a recent extended drought (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010). Developing (<20 years) native mixed-species plantings in a nearby region showed rapid recovery of structure and cover, with no loss of species, within 5 years of fire (Pickup et al, 2013).…”
Section: Establishment Choices To Increase C Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pickup et al . () reported that species richness in a burned vegetation community did not reach that of a nearby unburned community until 2–5 years after fire. Experiments with small fires at the York Rd ESBS community are yet to demonstrate statistically significant increases (Perkins et al .…”
Section: Progress and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery of species diversity and abundance of ESBS areas to a level similar to healthy reference sites is likely to take time, whether after fire, thinning or planting. Pickup et al (2013) reported that species richness in a burned vegetation community did not reach that of a nearby unburned community until 2-5 years after fire. Experiments with small fires at the York Rd ESBS community are yet to demonstrate statistically significant increases (Perkins et al 2012).…”
Section: Progress and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%