1984
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990050506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying breast carcinomas with DNA measurements and morphometry

Abstract: The relation between the DNA distribution pattern and the variables DNA content and nuclear area was investigated in 73 breast carcinomas. According to the DNA patterns, the tumors were subclassified into groups I, 11, 111, and IV (Auer's classification). The Auer's classes correlate with prognosis. In this investigation it was shown that Auer's classes strongly correlate with the standard deviation of DNA content and mean nuclear area. The carcinomas were subclassified using data of DNA content and nuclear ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assumptions 9-1 1 are probably the most vulnerable, although they have also been considered as acceptable by other authors (McCready & Papadimitriou, 1983;Bins & Takens, 1985) for DNA histogram correction schemes. Concerning assumption 9, the variance of the volume, inside a given ploidy peak, is known to be larger than that of the DNA amount (Rowinski et al, 1978) and this is due to the fact that the good volumeDNA correlation observed between different ploidy peaks (review in Rigaut et al, 1982;Boon et al, 1984) is not present inside one peak (Cavalli, 1960). This explains the overlapping which remains between ploidy peaks after unfolding (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assumptions 9-1 1 are probably the most vulnerable, although they have also been considered as acceptable by other authors (McCready & Papadimitriou, 1983;Bins & Takens, 1985) for DNA histogram correction schemes. Concerning assumption 9, the variance of the volume, inside a given ploidy peak, is known to be larger than that of the DNA amount (Rowinski et al, 1978) and this is due to the fact that the good volumeDNA correlation observed between different ploidy peaks (review in Rigaut et al, 1982;Boon et al, 1984) is not present inside one peak (Cavalli, 1960). This explains the overlapping which remains between ploidy peaks after unfolding (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is at least one biological case where a relationship of the type C z W / V is generally accepted inside a specific cellular category, the volume ( V ) of the cell nucleus is known to be well correlated linearly to its DNA content (D) (review in Rigaut et al, 1982;Boon et al, 1984). Therefore, with three additional assumptions, our model allows the unfolding of nuclear DNA-content histograms obtained from sections.…”
Section: E S T I M a T I O N Of S L A B F R A G M E N T V O L U M Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next to the ploidy histogram evaluation criteria mentioned above for FCM, specific ICM DNA histogram criteria are the Auer ploidy classes (Figure 2), 9 Boecking's malignancy index, 10 entropy, 11 the 2C deviation index and the 5c‐exceeding rate (5cER) 12 . Certain authors define a tumour as aneuploid if the ICM‐obtained DNA histogram shows one single cell with a 5cER DNA content.…”
Section: Short Description Of Quantitative Pathology Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, these authors demonstrated that metastases and primary tumors shared the same DNA histogram pattern (5). In addition, nuclear protein content (61, estrogren receptor level (3) and nuclear size (9) were also correlated with these four subgroups. However the proposed classification was limited in that it did not take into account general important biologic parameters which could alter the biologic behavior of cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%