2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-4033-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifications In Brief: The Gartland Classification of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
54
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The commonly accepted definition of significant coronal plane malalignment is change of >128 in Baumann angle [18] and the failure of the anterior humeral line to intersect the capitellum's physis was considered as loss of sagittal plane reduction, similar to Gartland classification [19]. After analysis of our data we feel that the Baumann angle was not a reliable parameter in assessing postoperative alignment in a splinted, flexed elbow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The commonly accepted definition of significant coronal plane malalignment is change of >128 in Baumann angle [18] and the failure of the anterior humeral line to intersect the capitellum's physis was considered as loss of sagittal plane reduction, similar to Gartland classification [19]. After analysis of our data we feel that the Baumann angle was not a reliable parameter in assessing postoperative alignment in a splinted, flexed elbow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The most common cause of flexion-type SHF in children is a direct fall on the elbow, which results in failure of the posterior cortex and thus anterior angulation of the distal fragment [4]. Flexion-type fractures are classified as extension-type fractures according to Gartland classification system as nondisplaced, partially displaced, and completely displaced [8,9]. The treatment of flexion-type fractures can be either: 1) closed reduction under anesthesia by traction, correction of displacement and angulation and stabilization with a long arm cast in 20° of elbow-flexion, 2) closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or 3) open reduction and percutaneous pinning [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,14 É a classificação mais utilizada, com alta concordância intraobservador e interobservador (►Figura 1). 1,3 Tipo I: sem desvio, ou minimamente desviada (< 2 mm). O periósteo íntegro em toda a circunferência mantém a estabilidade.…”
Section: Classificaçãounclassified
“…1,4 Tipo III: desvio completo, sem contato entre as corticais, com maior risco de lesões neurovasculares e interposição de partes moles. 3,11 São fraturas instáveis e geralmente de difícil redução. Porém, o periósteo posterior parcialmente preservado ajuda na redução e estabilização da fratura quando o cotovelo é fletido, facilitando a fixação.…”
Section: Classificaçãounclassified