2019
DOI: 10.5935/2359-4802.20190057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification System for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Based on a Sample of the Brazilian Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, great heterogeneity among nationalities has been demonstrated,14,22 probably due to different demographic and biopsychosocial characteristics. In Brazil, reference values for V˙ o 2peak on a treadmill have been described in four regions: South,17 Southeast,18 Midwest,21 and Northeast 19. As observed in North American regions from the FRIEND-I study,14 regional differences in Brazil can be expected as well, considering the significant population variations among an extensive geographic territory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Also, great heterogeneity among nationalities has been demonstrated,14,22 probably due to different demographic and biopsychosocial characteristics. In Brazil, reference values for V˙ o 2peak on a treadmill have been described in four regions: South,17 Southeast,18 Midwest,21 and Northeast 19. As observed in North American regions from the FRIEND-I study,14 regional differences in Brazil can be expected as well, considering the significant population variations among an extensive geographic territory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If considered only individuals ≥80 years, this study found higher averages: 24.6 ml/kg/min (men) e 24.4 ml/kg/min (women). Using cardiopulmonary stress test (CST), Almeida et al [17] evaluated 103 individuals with more than 70 years old, without cardiac disease, and found average values of 22.06 ± 4.7 ml/kg/min (men) and 17.41 ± 3.7 ml/kg/min (women) in the 70-79 group; and 19.20 ± 3.4 ml/kg/min (men) e 16.56 ± 2.9 ml/kg/min (women) for the ≥80 years old group. The VO2max averages presented here are higher, and this could be explained by method differences, reported by Lima et al [30], who found that calculated VO2max is overestimated by 15-38% when compared to measured VO2max in a CST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FC can be affected by aging due to myocardial, blood vessels, and metabolic impairments in the presence or absence of detectable cardiovascular disease. The gold standard for FC assessment is the cardiopulmonary exercise test, with direct determination of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) [16,17]. FC can also be assessed in advanced elderly with a safe, effective, and wellestablished method; the conventional exercise test (ET), which safeguarded protocols and interpretation, can help to detect diseases, monitor cardiovascular conditions, promote exercise, and reduce the sedentary time for the oldest-old adults [15,[18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Functional Capacity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Almeida et al,. 6 publicaram no Brasil uma grande amostra populacional brasileira (chamada tabela AEMA) com padrões de referência para capacidade funcional da TCPE e mostraram discrepâncias importantes na classificação da ACR quando comparada a outras tabelas amplamente utilizadas em nosso meio (American Heart Association, 7 estudo de Cooper 8 e Universidade Federal de São Paulo 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified