2013
DOI: 10.1086/670671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Variable Stars Using Thick-Pen Transform Method

Abstract: A suitable classification of variable stars is an important task for understanding galaxy structure and evaluating stellar evolution. Most traditional approaches for classification have used various features of variable stars such as period, amplitude, color index, and Fourier coefficients. Recently, by focusing only on the light curve shape, Deb and Singh proposed a classification method based on multivariate principal component analysis (PCA). They applied the PCA method to light curves and compared its resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within astronomy in particular RF classification is one of the more widely-employed methods of machine-learning, though many alternatives exist. For example, Masci et al (2014) use the RF method for variable-star lightcurve classification, while others have approached this problem via the use of, e.g., support vector machines (Woźniak et al 2004), Kohonen self-organizing maps (Brett et al 2004), Bayesian networks and mixture-models (Mahabal et al 2008), principle component analysis (Deb & Singh 2009), multivariate Bayesian and Gaussian mixture models (Blomme et al 2011), and thick-pen transform methods (Park et al 2013).…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within astronomy in particular RF classification is one of the more widely-employed methods of machine-learning, though many alternatives exist. For example, Masci et al (2014) use the RF method for variable-star lightcurve classification, while others have approached this problem via the use of, e.g., support vector machines (Woźniak et al 2004), Kohonen self-organizing maps (Brett et al 2004), Bayesian networks and mixture-models (Mahabal et al 2008), principle component analysis (Deb & Singh 2009), multivariate Bayesian and Gaussian mixture models (Blomme et al 2011), and thick-pen transform methods (Park et al 2013).…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF classification has extensive and diverse applications in many fields (e.g., economics, bioinformatics, sociology). Within astronomy in particular RF clas- (Blomme et al 2011), and thick-pen transform methods (Park et al 2013).…”
Section: Machine-learned Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within astronomy in particular RF clas- sification is one of the more widely-employed methods of machine-learning, though many alternatives exist. For example, Masci et al (2014) use the RF method for variable-star lightcurve classification, while others have approached this problem via the use of, e.g., support vector machines (Woźniak et al 2004), Kohonen self-organizing maps (Brett et al 2004;Masters et al 2015), Bayesian networks and mixturemodels (Mahabal et al 2008), principlal component analysis (Deb & Singh 2009), multivariate Bayesian and Gaussian mixture models (Blomme et al 2011), and thick-pen transform methods (Park et al 2013).…”
Section: Completeness and Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%