2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of reviews of e-healthcare services to improve patient satisfaction: Insights from an emerging economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More obvious and easy to research are online healthcare platforms such as webmd, practo, good doctors, etc. These platforms allow doctors to make the best use of utilizing their spare time and medical expertise to provide services to remote patients, enabling patients to experience appropriate services through online platforms [11]. People can access health information and services or manage their health conditions by consulting remote doctors in hospitals across the country [15].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More obvious and easy to research are online healthcare platforms such as webmd, practo, good doctors, etc. These platforms allow doctors to make the best use of utilizing their spare time and medical expertise to provide services to remote patients, enabling patients to experience appropriate services through online platforms [11]. People can access health information and services or manage their health conditions by consulting remote doctors in hospitals across the country [15].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(doctor online score) = 0.037 + 0.040 (treatment e cacy satisfaction) + 0.037 (treatment modality access) + 0.038 (treatment cost$) + 0.054 (attitude satisfaction) + 0.052 * (treatment process expectation) + 0.046 (corresponding to the total number of doctor visits) + µ + ε (10) (Satisfaction with treatment e cacy) = 0.037 + 0.041 (doctor's online rating) + 0.038 (access to treatment modalities) + 0.038 (cost of treatment $) + 0.054 (attitudinal satisfaction) + 0.053 * (expectations of the treatment process) + 0.046 (corresponding to the total number of doctor's visits) + µ + ε (11) where µ denotes the capture of unobserved individual-speci c effects and ε it denotes the residual random error term. The coe cient of the interaction term is positive with R2 = 0.871, which is a good t, indicating the presence of moderating variables and high reliability of the model.…”
Section: Hypothesis Validation and Model T Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, hospitals are required to provide quality services in accordance with established standards and can reach all levels of society (Martin et al, 2021). Quality health services are health services that can satisfy every service user in accordance with the average level of satisfaction of the population and its implementation in accordance with established professional standards and codes of ethics (Dhakate & Joshi, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al (2022) [58], assessed the effectiveness of MS Azure sentiment analysis service in conjunction with other sentiment analysis tools with metaphoric testing. In another study [59], the MS Azure sentiment machine learning was used to calculate the sentiment and satisfaction expressed by patients regarding online doctor services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%