Malignant Lymphomas Other Than Hodgkin’s Disease 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81092-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 513 publications
0
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kiel classification of NHL [18] is essentially based on a comparison of com mon morphological and immunological features of normal and neoplastic cells [25,26] has not yet been es tablished or is hypothetical [ 13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kiel classification of NHL [18] is essentially based on a comparison of com mon morphological and immunological features of normal and neoplastic cells [25,26] has not yet been es tablished or is hypothetical [ 13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least morphologically, subsets of lymphocytes exist in both ML,WDL and ML,PDL (Lennert, 1978;Levine and Dorfman, 1975;Pangalis et al, 1977;Rilke et al, 1978;Said et al, 1979) and some components have been thought to resemble the partially or fully transformed lymphocytes of germinal centers (Rilke et al, 1978;Said et al, 1979). On the basis of the morphometric data in this report, perhaps there is some validity to these observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Since the nucleus is the cell organelle that is the principal basis for subtyping NHL into categories with differing prognoses, the importance of quantitating nuclear features is self-evident. Lymphocyte nuclear profile size and shape can readily be assessed in histologic sections, and these are the parameters that are usually measured (Abbott et al, 1982;Crocker et al, l982,1983a,b;Dardick, 1984a;Donhuijsen et al, 1984;Tosi et al, 1983Tosi et al, , 1984van der Valk et al, 1982van der Valk et al, , 1983, since they are so central to current NHL classification schemes Collins, 1974,1979;Lennert, 1978). However, the appearance of nuclei in histologic sections is also influenced by the amount and distribution of condensed chromatin, a nuclear constituent that is best assessed at the ultrastructural level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 840 cases of NHL were classified histologically, according to the three classifications: Rappaport, Kiel, and the WF. [2][3][4] Patients were staged according to the Ann Arbor system.I2 Clinical staging procedures used on presentation included history and complete physical examination, chest radiograph, complete blood counts, blood biochemistry, iliac crest trephine biopsy, and bone marrow aspirate. Lymphograms and/or computed axial tomography were done to detect abdominal disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%