2010 IAPR Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Remote Sensing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/prrs.2010.5742800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of multitemporal remote sensing data using Conditional Random Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most widely used classifier is Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC), which restrict the data to be assumed to have Gaussian distribution. SVM has a free assumption and ability to find complex classification boundaries with good generalization performance [11]. SVM classifier also has been used to model the unary potential of CRF and exhibited excellent performance [17].In this paper, we adopt SVM classifier to calculate ( | ) i pyx and in this manner SVM is integrated into the unary potential.…”
Section: Unary Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most widely used classifier is Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC), which restrict the data to be assumed to have Gaussian distribution. SVM has a free assumption and ability to find complex classification boundaries with good generalization performance [11]. SVM classifier also has been used to model the unary potential of CRF and exhibited excellent performance [17].In this paper, we adopt SVM classifier to calculate ( | ) i pyx and in this manner SVM is integrated into the unary potential.…”
Section: Unary Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general framework of modelling context information is using Markov random field (MRF) approaches [11][12], which is a classical probabilistic graphical model. However, the interaction between neighbouring image sites (pixels or objects) is restricted to class labels, whereas the features extracted from different image sites are assumed to be conditionally independent [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Roscher et al, 2010) use Import Vector Machines with CRFs to classify regions of Landsat TM images into multiple land cover classes. (Hoberg et al, 2010) adapt CRFs to multi-temporal multi-class land cover classification by adding temporal interactions to the standard unary and spatial potentials. Only few works exist that apply CRFs to semantic segmentation in urban scenes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches that take the temporal dependencies into account usually model temporal interaction by class transition matrices that can be determined by an expert (Hoberg et al, 2010) (Hoberg et al, 2011) empirically from existing data sources, * Corresponding author or computed statistically (Leite et al, 2011) (Kenduiywo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%