2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of crops and weeds from digital images: A support vector machine approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows the comparative analysis of the accuracy of the proposed ATP extraction method and existing techniques. The proposed method is compared with the existing SVM approach for classification of crops and weeds from the digital image [10] and SVM based Crop/weed classification in maize fields [27]. The overall accuracy of the proposed approach is 99.3 %, which is relatively higher than the existing techniques.…”
Section: Hausdorff Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 shows the comparative analysis of the accuracy of the proposed ATP extraction method and existing techniques. The proposed method is compared with the existing SVM approach for classification of crops and weeds from the digital image [10] and SVM based Crop/weed classification in maize fields [27]. The overall accuracy of the proposed approach is 99.3 %, which is relatively higher than the existing techniques.…”
Section: Hausdorff Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy level of the proposed method is compared with the accuracy levels of the existing techniques such as SVM approach for classification of crops and weeds from digital image [10] and SVM based Crop/weed classification in maize fields [27].…”
Section: • Hausdorff Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By doing so, any ambient visible light was blocked (Ahmed et al 2012;Å strand and Baerveldt 2002;Haug et al 2014;Lee et al 1999). Constant illumination under the cover was then obtained using artificial lighting (Nieuwenhuizen et al 2010;Polder et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu & Wen (2009) proposed a support vector machine classifier to identify weeds in corn fields during early crop stages, using the co-occurrence matrix in gray levels and statistical histogram properties to extract texture features with greater accuracy to 92%. Similarly, Ahmed, et al (2012) evaluate fourteen colour, size and moment invariant features to get an optimal combination that provides the highest classification rate; their result achieves above 97% accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%