2017
DOI: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Cannabis Cultivars Marketed in Canada for Medical Purposes by Quantification of Cannabinoids and Terpenes Using HPLC-DAD and GC-MS

Abstract: For over a century, research on cannabis has been hampered by its legal status as a narcotic. The recent legalization of cannabis for medical purposes in North America requires rigorous standardization of its phytochemical composition in the interest of consumer safety and medicinal efficacy. To utilize medicinal cannabis as a predictable medicine, it is crucial to classify hundreds of cultivars with respect to dozens of therapeutic cannabinoids and terpenes, as opposed to the current industrial or forensic cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A striking feature of the plots of CBDA concentrations against THCA concentrations is the positive correlation between the two for those strains which make each compound in significant quantity (the center cluster). The finding that all those strains with high THCA also have corresponding high CBDA levels, in that subset of strains, is also a striking finding of other studies of a range of strain collections, from the Canadian medical market (Jin et al 2017), a collection of strains from diverse sources including breeders and law enforcement (Hillig and Mahlberg 2004) and a study of the legalized market in the State of Washington (Jikomes and Zoorob 2018). Judging from these studies, it appears to be very uncommon to have strains that would have more than 15% THCA and have more than a negligible amount of CBDA (> 3%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A striking feature of the plots of CBDA concentrations against THCA concentrations is the positive correlation between the two for those strains which make each compound in significant quantity (the center cluster). The finding that all those strains with high THCA also have corresponding high CBDA levels, in that subset of strains, is also a striking finding of other studies of a range of strain collections, from the Canadian medical market (Jin et al 2017), a collection of strains from diverse sources including breeders and law enforcement (Hillig and Mahlberg 2004) and a study of the legalized market in the State of Washington (Jikomes and Zoorob 2018). Judging from these studies, it appears to be very uncommon to have strains that would have more than 15% THCA and have more than a negligible amount of CBDA (> 3%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The ratios of total THC to total CBD matched with some of those representatives of the wide-leaflet drug (WLD) ("Indica" in the vernacular) and narrow-leaflet drug (NLD) ("Sativa" in the vernacular) biotypes 55,56 but contradicted others 49,57 . Studies have shown that the concentrations of total THC and total CBD have no discriminatory value for chemovars in the modern vernacular ("Sativa" vs. "Indica") due to the misuse of the botanical nomenclature, extensive cross-breeding, and unreliable labelling during unrecorded hybridization [48][49][50][51]56,58,59 .…”
Section: Methods Validation For Sterols and Triterpenoids The Correlamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multipart study included the development of quantitative methods using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) for cannabinoids, liquid chromatography coupled with a standard ultraviolet detector and mass spectroscopy (LC-UV-MS) for flavonoids, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) for terpenoids and sterols. Relevant compounds were selected based on their pharmacological activities 5,8 , or use in other cannabis classification studies [48][49][50][51] . The methods were then employed for generating the chemical profiles of the inflorescences, leaves, stem barks, and roots of three selected cannabis chemovars (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EO compounds were identified by a comparison of their Mass spectra with those reported in the Mass Spectral Library Nist 14 and by means of their Linear Retention Indices (LRI) relative to a series of n-alkanes (C 8 -C 30 ) on the same capillary column. LRI obtained were compared with values reported in the literature [26,27,[35][36][37][38][39][40]].…”
Section: Apparatus Sample Preparation Identification and Quantificamentioning
confidence: 99%