2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00091-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Brucella strains isolated from marine mammals by infrequent restriction site-PCR and development of specific PCR identification tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, PCR-based methods have been used increasingly due to their accuracy, sensitivity, and speed of identification and the ability to work with DNA as opposed to highly infectious live cultures. A wide array of genetic polymorphisms can be assayed for the differentiation of Brucella spp., including the insertion element IS711 (2,3,29,31) and genes of outer membrane proteins (7,10,20), and other assay techniques may be used, such as whole-gene differentiation (30), infrequent restriction site PCR (6), and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (37). PCR-based assays for identifying Brucella were recently reviewed (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PCR-based methods have been used increasingly due to their accuracy, sensitivity, and speed of identification and the ability to work with DNA as opposed to highly infectious live cultures. A wide array of genetic polymorphisms can be assayed for the differentiation of Brucella spp., including the insertion element IS711 (2,3,29,31) and genes of outer membrane proteins (7,10,20), and other assay techniques may be used, such as whole-gene differentiation (30), infrequent restriction site PCR (6), and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (37). PCR-based assays for identifying Brucella were recently reviewed (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, B. canis, B. neotomae, some biovars of B. abortus and B. suis and the Brucella species isolated from marine mammals described later on, could not be detected by AMOS PCR. Novel IS711 chromosomal locations specific to marine mammal Brucella isolates have been identified allowing their identification and classification based on the same principle as AMOS PCR (Cloeckaert et al, 2003;Maquart et al, 2008;Zygmunt et al, 2010). Real-time PCR assays based on some of the genetic markers described above were later developed for Brucella species identification (Al Dahouk et al, 2007c) but these tests have the same limitations regarding B. suis and B. abortus detection.…”
Section: Molecular Detection and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several subgroups within each species have been identified by molecular typing methods, such as multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), multilocus variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) analysis (MLVA), or omp2a and omp2b porin gene diversity analysis (2,4,6,8,9,14,15,16,18,28,32). Among them, one subgroup within B. ceti, which is composed exclusively of strains isolated from various dolphin species, has been proposed to constitute a separate species with the name B. delphini (2,14,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%