2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and retrieval on macroinvertebrate image databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed levels of taxonomical accuracy match levels of human accuracy for other aquatic taxonomic groups [8]. In follow-up work on the same dataset [9], a significant improvement on the classification accuracy was achieved. The Following an evolutionary radial basis function (RBF) neural network approach the classification error (CE) rate was 7.41% for train and 5.14% for the test set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed levels of taxonomical accuracy match levels of human accuracy for other aquatic taxonomic groups [8]. In follow-up work on the same dataset [9], a significant improvement on the classification accuracy was achieved. The Following an evolutionary radial basis function (RBF) neural network approach the classification error (CE) rate was 7.41% for train and 5.14% for the test set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In order to perform comparative evaluations, the same Benthic macroinvertebrate image database as in [7] and [9] is used in this work. This database consists of 1350 images representing 8 different taxonomical groups: Baetis rhodani, Diura nanseni, Heptagenia sulphurea, Hydropsyche pellucidulla, Hydropsyche siltalai, Isoperla sp., Rhyacophila nubila and Taeniopteryx nebulosa.…”
Section: Dataset Creation and Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crossed work Besides the related work above, the research of EM classification (Akiba and Kahui 2000;Amaral 2003;Amaral et al 1999Amaral et al , 2004Amaral et al , 2008Chen and Li 2008;Ferreira and Rasband 2012;Ginoris et al 2006Ginoris et al , 2007aGray et al 2002;Jenne et al 2001Jenne et al , 2002Jenne et al , 2003Kiranyaz et al 2011;Chen 2008, 2009;Motta et al 2001;Ruusuvuori et al 2008;Thiel and Davies 1995;Thiel andWiltshire 1995 in Sect. 3 andMM classification (Javidi et al 2006g) in Sect.…”
Section: Original Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Kiranyaz et al (2011), a CBMIA system is proposed to classify micro-alike images of macroinvertebrate, where multiple global, local, shape, colour, pair-wise, texture features are extracted using a third party toolbox (ImageJ Ferreira and Rasband 2012), and then SVM, Bayesian and two ANN classifiers are designed. In the experiment, 1350 micro-alike images of eight different texonomical groups are used for system evaluation, and finally the lowest classification error rate around 6% is achieved by the SVM classifier.…”
Section: Overview Of Em Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%