2009
DOI: 10.3328/tl.2009.01.04.295-308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and regression tree, principal components analysis and multiple linear regression to summarize data and understand travel behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to knowledge retained from previously successful route choices or having route-seeking skills to find optimal routes. Consistent with previous findings in the field of travel behavior (Pitombo et al, 2009), drivers earning between Can$80 000 and $99 999 place more importance on their travel time. As a result, it appears that their time is used more wisely when commuting to work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This could be due to knowledge retained from previously successful route choices or having route-seeking skills to find optimal routes. Consistent with previous findings in the field of travel behavior (Pitombo et al, 2009), drivers earning between Can$80 000 and $99 999 place more importance on their travel time. As a result, it appears that their time is used more wisely when commuting to work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although some of these limitations are absent in other models of discrete choice models, such as Mixed models and Nested Logit models, various studies have been published about applications of Arti8icial Intelligence (AI) tools for forecasting travel demand and their spatial interactions (Faghri and Sandeep, 1998;Tillema et al, 2006;Pitombo et al, 2009;Rasouli and Nikraz, 2013;Pitombo et al, 2017). This research concluded that AI tools can forecast spatial trip distribution accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In general, the built environment, socio-demographics and attitudes are found to be the key factors influencing the car ownership and use. In particular, Wang and Cao [8] found that the impacts of built environment on the individuals' activity-travel behaviour are different among different socio-demographic groups, and that neighbourhood planning can affect the influence. Jiang et al [9] pointed out that a strategic urban planning favouring bus rapid transit development, mixed land uses, human friendly streets and restrictive parking are vital to reduce car dependency in rapidly motorizing Chinese cities.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies of land use and travel behaviours show that land use characteristics, such as land use intensity and mixed use, are found to have a significant impact on travel decisions [17][18][19][20]. Pitombo et al [21] and João et al [22] found that areas with high degree of mixed land use increase the number of trips using sustainable travel modes like public transportation and non-motorized modes, and travellers there prefer to accomplish short travel distances. Especially, a high degree of mixed land use around a workplace might be associated with a more complex trip chain pattern including both vehicle and walking trips, and residents may have more non-work activities before and after their work time [20,22,23].…”
Section: Travel Pattern Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%