'Classical' Roots of Input-Output Analysis: A Short Account of its Long Prehistory

Abstract

This paper discusses the roots of input-output analysis in 'classical' economics. The authors considered include Petty and Cantillon; Quesnay, the physiocrats and their critic Isnard; Smith, Ricardo, Torrens and Dmitriev; Marx, von Bortkiewicz and von Charasoff; Leontief; and Remak. It is argued that, in terms of method and content, input-output analysis is akin to the classical approach to the theory of production, distribution and relative prices in that (i) it requires all magnitudes to be observable and (ii) starts essentially from the same set of data. It is shown that many important modern concepts have been anticipated by the earlier authors. The prehistory of input-output analysis is also meant to provide new perspectives on potential future developments of the field.Circular Flow, Classical Economics, Reproduction Surplus Product, Value And Distribution,

Who is Going to Kiss Sleeping Beauty? On the ‘Classical’ Analytical Origins and Perspectives of Input–Output Analysis

“…As Neri Salvadori and I have argued (Kurz & Salvadori, 2000), there were a number of scholars whose writings foreshadowed and occasionally even anticipated major ideas in Leontief's seminal contributions. Let us go back to ancient times.…”

Why didn't Charasoff and Remak use Perron–Frobenius mathematics?

“…8 In the 1980s the scientific reputation of Charasoff suddenly started to grow, thanks to the amazing discoveries of Egidi and Gilibert (1984). In the following years, many other authors studied Charasoff, for example, Duffner and Huth (1987), Kurz and Salvadori (1993, 1995, 2000, Stamatis (1999), and Mori (2007Mori ( , 2011, all awarding Charasoff the status of a remarkable pioneer. It is now well known that Charasoff independently discovered some Sraffa-like tools.…”

Three Centuries of Macro-Economic Statistics

“…Commodity-flow accounting started in Sweden (Lindahl), Denmark (Kampmann) and the United States (Kuznets). In Sweden, 18 See also Baumol (2000), Kurz and Salvadori (2000) and Pressman (2006, pp. 217-229).…”