1983
DOI: 10.1080/14662048308447434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class, state, and Prebendal politics in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many concluded that such dynamics lead to weak democratic regimes that are easily toppled by various types of challengers. Such was the case, for example, in Joseph's account of 'prebendal' democracy in Nigeria (Joseph, 1987).…”
Section: Neopatrimonial Democracy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many concluded that such dynamics lead to weak democratic regimes that are easily toppled by various types of challengers. Such was the case, for example, in Joseph's account of 'prebendal' democracy in Nigeria (Joseph, 1987).…”
Section: Neopatrimonial Democracy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This governmental structure legalised a strong central control that individuals or groups of people have, over time, abused. Arguably, this abuse of power increases the social struggle for the control of resources and political positioning, as government offices and projects are used as means of wealth accumulation for individuals and groups (Joseph, 1983). From an organisational perspective, this is likely to impact differently, but may result in the same effect of social marginalisation.…”
Section: Class Age and Political Partisanshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] Thus, with the termination of colonial rule, the notion of politics in Africa transformed for the worse. From a struggle and concerted effort to achieve a qualitative change in the lives of the African masses, African politics transformed into "the struggle to control and exploit the offices of the state" [28] by even dubious and violent means. Thus, in the immediate independent Africa, the people became captives as it was under colonial rule, but to their own leaders, who marginalised and manipulated them for self-aggrandisement.…”
Section: The Realisation Of Independence In Africa and The Emergmentioning
confidence: 99%