Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations

Aminabadi, Naser Asl; Najafpour, Ebrahim; Erfanparast, Leila; Samiei, Mohammad; Haghifar, Monireh; Deljavan, Alireza Sighary; Jamali, Zahra; Azar, Fatemeh Pournaghi; Shokravi, Marzieh

doi:10.5681/joddd.2014.016

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To simulate the aging condition of the oral cavity, the samples were placed in water baths in a thermocycler for 500 cycles between 6°C and 60°C with a dwell time of 30 s per bath. 20 - 22 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bond strength of conventional versus modified methods for Class IV restorations in primary incisors: An in vitro study

Aminabadi

Halimi

Golsanamlou

et al. 2022

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Aesthetic restorations of severely decayed anterior primary teeth are challenging due to the small size of the teeth and the large pulp chambers. Therefore, this study evaluated and compared the tensile and shear bond strengths of conventional versus modified methods (slot technique) of Cl IV restorations in primary incisors. Methods. A total of 120 extracted intact maxillary primary central and lateral incisors were divided into two groups. In group A, conventional Cl IV cavities were prepared. In group B, after conventional cavity preparation, four and three incisal slots were prepared on the incisal edges of the central and lateral incisors, respectively. All the teeth were restored using composite resin, and then the tensile and shear bond strengths were evaluated. Results. A statistically significant increase in the tensile bond strength of restorations was recorded in the modified technique compared to the conventional method (P=0.001). Although an increase in the shear bond strengths was found in the modified method, the value did not reach a statistically significant level (P=0.158). The most frequent fracture type was adhesive in the conventional group and cohesive in the modified group, considering the tensile and shear bond strength tests. In both groups, the highest average tensile bond strength was recorded in teeth with the cohesive fracture in dentin, and the lowest average was seen in the adhesive type. Conclusions. Incisal slots could increase the tensile bond strengths of Cl IV composite resin restorations in primary teeth.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bond strength of conventional versus modified methods for Class IV restorations in primary incisors: An in vitro study

Aminabadi

Halimi

Golsanamlou

et al. 2022

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sarapultseva¹,

Sarapultsev

2021

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Depending on the stage of the disease and the child’s age, different types of interventions can be used to treat early childhood caries. As a result, there is not enough clinical evidence to show that one kind of restoration is better than another. The objective of this longitudinal study was to compare the results of 36 months of clinical performance of primary incisors restorations using an incremental layering technique with the ceram.x® SphereTECTM nanoceramic composite (Dentsply) or a full coverage technique with transparent strip crowns (Frasaco GmbH) with the same composite in children with or without biological caries risk factors. Methods: 80 patients (females 42/52.5%) were included in the study. A total of 160 restorations were performed. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, according to modified Ryge criteria. Conclusion: Restorations with both techniques were clinically highly successful and showed similar clinical performance at postoperatively regardless of the presence of biological factors of caries risk.

show abstract

Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations

Cited by 2 publications

References 30 publications

Bond strength of conventional versus modified methods for Class IV restorations in primary incisors: An in vitro study

Bond strength of conventional versus modified methods for Class IV restorations in primary incisors: An in vitro study

36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About