2011
DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2011.47.6.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class, Cultural Capital, and the Mobile Phone

Abstract: This article uses data from a representative survey on the applications of information and communication technologies to investigate the use of the mobile phone as a cultural object by different groups of respondents/consumers. Setting out from the premise that the symbolic and artefactual nature of new media, their 'thingness', should be a central part of any investigation of their social and cultural signifi cance, the article focuses on the meaning of the mobile phone as a cultural object and commodity sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Internet access is obviously not a homogeneous phenomenon, as many other studies have stressed [Chadwick 2006;Selwyn 2004;Tondeur et al 2010;van Dijk 2006]. There are many digital gaps and different types of exclusions, which have been articulated previously in relation to mobile phones, at least in Slovenia [Luthar and Kropivnik 2011;Petrič, Petrovčič and Vehovar 2011]. Appropriation of technology is only in an extremely limited sense a result of individual choice, since most digital exclusion is actually a response to structural tensions, in the form of economic status, lack of skills and a perception of technology as a useful (or not useful) tool, that appear to correlate strongly with educational achievements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internet access is obviously not a homogeneous phenomenon, as many other studies have stressed [Chadwick 2006;Selwyn 2004;Tondeur et al 2010;van Dijk 2006]. There are many digital gaps and different types of exclusions, which have been articulated previously in relation to mobile phones, at least in Slovenia [Luthar and Kropivnik 2011;Petrič, Petrovčič and Vehovar 2011]. Appropriation of technology is only in an extremely limited sense a result of individual choice, since most digital exclusion is actually a response to structural tensions, in the form of economic status, lack of skills and a perception of technology as a useful (or not useful) tool, that appear to correlate strongly with educational achievements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today's society revolves around technology, and due to the constant need for the cutting-edge high-tech products, people tend to generate a massive amount of e-waste [5]. E-wastes are the electronic components that are destined for reuse, resale, salvage, recycling, or disposal [6].…”
Section: The E-waste Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People are currently on the lookout for high-tech and cutting-edge items. Furthermore, complying with the guidelines and rules of a regulating body such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a difficult task [1]. E-waste are expected to be found in the quantity of 5 million tonnes each year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%