Clarion call: A comment on Hamm et al.'s (2022) diagrammatic map for a future research agenda

Blount‐Hill, Kwan‐Lamar; Gau, Jacinta M.

doi:10.1111/lcrp.12221

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The second overarching critique highlights the siloed nature of legitimacy research. In their comment, Blount‐Hill and Gau (2022) argue that mainstream legitimacy scholarship has neglected important areas of research that could provide useful perspectives. In particular, they highlight the need to think beyond what Tyler called ‘teachable moments’ (Tyler et al, 2014) and to consider the meso‐ and macro‐level ‘interactions’ that impact the health of governance relationships.…”

Section: Critique 2 What About the Rest Of The Literature?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In so doing, we sought to create firm ground from which other scholars can effectively and efficiently engage with and build upon the state of the science. We are therefore excited and humbled by the engagement of six experts working in this area who responded to our work in three peer commentaries that collectively represent exactly the kind of conversation we hoped to facilitate (Blount‐Hill & Gau, 2022; Jackson & Bradford, 2022; Trinkner & Reisig, 2022). Below, we distill their rich insights into key criticisms.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pushing past the plateau

Hamm

Cavanagh

Lee

2022

Legal Criminol Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In our target article (Hamm et al., Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2022), we propose a Concentric Diagram of Legitimacy as an organizing tool for legitimacy theory. In so doing, we hoped to stimulate a scholarly discussion about the state of the literature and the best avenues for pushing past the field’s current intellectual plateau. Six experts took us up on this call and provided three commentaries that push our thinking but, more importantly, identify important opportunities for advancing legitimacy theory. In our response here, we distil their rich insights into key criticisms which then lead to opportunities for future research.

show abstract

Section: Critique 2 What About the Rest Of The Literature?mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%