Citoyenneté et parité en Belgique. Figures et projets dans le débat paritaire

Baudino, Claudie

doi:10.4000/books.pum.18708

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As shown by Baudino in her analysis of debates concerning gender equality in Belgium, the identity of persons who have access to the regime (the rights holders) and the identity of the excluded are also defined by the manner in which public problems are constructed and debated in the public sphere. 34 From this perspective, aside from the issue of denial of civil, social, and political rights, and apart from the absence of recognition, the exclusion of undocumented migrants from the citizenship regime has a symbolic aspect as well: the designation of illegal migrations in the public sphere as a public problem by public authorities. In order to address this issue, we have focused on one indicator: the politicization of illegal migration (in other words, the extent to which public authorities prioritize the handling of this issue in their public discourses).…”

Section: Beyond Exclusion From Citizenship: the Borderline Citizenship Regime And The Conditions Of Mobilizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobilizing in Borderline Citizenship Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Undocumented Migrants’ Collective Actions

Monforte

Dufour

2011

Politics & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobilizing in borderline citizenship regimes. A comparative analysis of undocumented migrants' collective actions 1 This article seeks to explain how and why groups and networks of undocumented migrants mobilizing in Berlin, Montreal and Paris since the beginning of the 2000s construct different types of claims. We explore the relationship between undocumented migrants and state authorities at the local level through the concept of the citizenship regime and its specific application to undocumented migrants (which we describe as the "borderline citizenship regime"). Despite their common formal exclusion from citizenship, non-status migrants experience different degrees and forms of exclusion in their daily lives, in terms of access to certain rights and services, recognition and belonging within the state (whether through formally or non-formally recognized means). As a result, they have an opportunity to create different, specific forms of leeway in the society in which they live. The concurrence of these different degrees of exclusion and different forms of leeway defines specific conditions of mobilization. We demonstrate how the content of their claims are influenced by these conditions of mobilization. Pierre Monforte is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre de recherche sur les politiques et le Développement social (CPDS), University of Montreal. His work focuses on the mobilizations of migrants from a comparative perspective and on transnationalization processes. He obtained his PhD at the European

show abstract

Section: Beyond Exclusion From Citizenship: the Borderline Citizenship Regime And The Conditions Of Mobilizationmentioning

confidence: 99%