How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public 2014
DOI: 10.4337/9781782545491.00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizens, policy feedback, and European welfare states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, in the domain of social policies, quite unsurprisingly, a great number of policy feedback effects are interested in social policy attitudes (e.g., Im & Meng, ), but we also see studies interested in political engagement (Bruch, Ferree, & Soss, ) and general attitudes, such as satisfaction with democracy (Kumlin, ).…”
Section: Results: Outcomes In Policy Feedback Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, in the domain of social policies, quite unsurprisingly, a great number of policy feedback effects are interested in social policy attitudes (e.g., Im & Meng, ), but we also see studies interested in political engagement (Bruch, Ferree, & Soss, ) and general attitudes, such as satisfaction with democracy (Kumlin, ).…”
Section: Results: Outcomes In Policy Feedback Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davenport (), for example, focuses on how experiences with military policies interact with town casualties in shaping political participation. In the domain of the welfare state, Kumlin () is interested in how social policy generosity interacts with the unemployment rate in affecting satisfaction with democracy. These studies show a promising direction within the literature in understanding the complex environment in which policy feedback effects are shaped.…”
Section: Results: Proximate Policy Feedback Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of just being an output of political decisions, policy is also seen as an input that creates frames and structures that affect people's incentives and perceptions (Pierson, ). Feedback effects in terms of attitudes and political behavior are then again transferred as an input to the policy process (see, e.g., Kumlin & Stadelmann‐Steffen, ). Policy is hence assumed to have consequences other than outcomes, like the number of patients treated by hospitals or how many senior citizens get help from home service; policy also affects mass opinion such as perceptions of government, political action, and trust (e.g., Kumlin, , ).…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Policy and Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After decades of debate about whether the welfare state was in crisis or by contrast absolutely impervious to all attempts at retrenchment or change, analysts now view welfare state politics as being characterized by incremental changes to cope with budgetary restrictions, but also in order to 'restructure', 'recalibrate' or to 'modernize' welfare state policies so as to better cope with 'new social risks' and to address new priorities such as 'activation' (Pierson 1998;Taylor-Gooby 2004;Armingeon and Bonoli 2007;Ferrera 2008;Häusermann 2010;Kumlin and Stadelmann-Steffen 2014). Thus, we use the term 'recalibration' to mean policy change intended to re-adjust an existing policy in light of changed circumstances or goals, regardless of whether the particular policy change is very limited or sweeping in scope.…”
Section: Democracy and Policy Recalibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%