1993
DOI: 10.2307/3110123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circumventing the Glass Ceiling: Women Executives in American State Governments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
110
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
110
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Women employees have to face "Gender Segregation" in their career development, which is described as a "glass ceiling" vividly or "horizontal sex segregation" (Anker, 2004). Low-level education is often considered as one of the main obstacles for the promotion of women (Bullard, Wright's, 1993;Schruijer, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women employees have to face "Gender Segregation" in their career development, which is described as a "glass ceiling" vividly or "horizontal sex segregation" (Anker, 2004). Low-level education is often considered as one of the main obstacles for the promotion of women (Bullard, Wright's, 1993;Schruijer, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[72][73][74] Some scholars argue that there still are a lot of organizational obstacles and that there is a long way to go before women will be treated on an equal basis in male dominant workplaces. [75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] Meanwhile, Rusaw [83] argues that to develop women's leadership and enhance the credibility of women managers in male dominant organization, it is critical for an organization to take action. Kim [84][85] also points out the importance of executive leadership in the field of diversity management and family benefit policies and that gender equality has been associated with organizational performance.…”
Section: Commitment To Gender-related Policy and Commitment To Organimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing demands, unfunded mandates, and other factors have prompted states to improve their administrative capacities. The states have increased the number of state agencies and programs, raised the number of employees to nearly five million, sought increased federal funds (in a time when federal sources are limited), and become "laboratories of democracy" with innovative programs and an increasingly qualified and representative state workforce (Osborne 1988;Bullard and Wright 1993;Nice 1994;Bowling andWright 1998a, 1998b).…”
Section: The Typology Of Aspirations: a Continuum Of Governmental Gromentioning
confidence: 99%