1952
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.4787.755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circumcision in a National Sample of 4-year-old Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series of consecutive conventional circumcisions in Australia, Leitch found that 9.5% of operations had to be repeated because of inadequate skin excision during the initial procedure, but in a study in the UK only 1% were repeated [9,10]. With a clamp circumcision it is essential to correctly mark beforehand the level of cutting (just proximal to the corona), as this decreases the risk of an incomplete circumcision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In a series of consecutive conventional circumcisions in Australia, Leitch found that 9.5% of operations had to be repeated because of inadequate skin excision during the initial procedure, but in a study in the UK only 1% were repeated [9,10]. With a clamp circumcision it is essential to correctly mark beforehand the level of cutting (just proximal to the corona), as this decreases the risk of an incomplete circumcision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…What part does hygiene of the preputial space play in various diseases (Saitmacher, 1960;Kalcev, 1964)? What is the incidence of circumcision in the various groups of the population (Carne, 1956;MacCarthy, Douglas, and Mogford, 1952;Osmond, 1953) ? Why is cancer of the penis practically never observed in circumcised men (Bleich, 1950;Clemmesen, 1965) ?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though these are probably the most commonly performed operations, only in the case of circumcision has there previously been a survey of the incidence in the whole country. Inspired by Gairdner (1949), MacCarthy et al (1952 analysed the incidence of this operation in a national sample of 4-year-olds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%