Circular Economy and Regenerative Sustainability in Emergency Housing: Eco-Efficient Prototype Design for Subaşi Refugee Camp in Turkey

Abstract

According to the most recent data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, in 2020, 82.4 million people were forcibly displaced. In addition to this situation, in the developed world, building construction consumes 40% of the world’s material resources and primary energy, while the construction industry generates 35% of industrial waste and 40% of total global emissions. Therefore, the objective of the research is to propose an eco-efficient prototype for emergency housing, from the point of view of circular economy and regenerative sustainability, that can respond to situations of natural or humanitarian disasters. To achieve this, it will be necessary to identify the problem that must be answered and develop a theoretical model that will serve as a guide for future interventions of these characteristics. Finally, to verify the applicability of the developed protocol, a field work is executed in an unorganized settlement, Subaşi camp, located in Turkey. This research presents a novel prototype that could be used as an alternative to current emergency housing, not only responding adequately to the minimum standards of habitability, but also doing so in an eco-efficient, environmentally correct way and promoting the Sustainable Development Goals and circular economy established in the 2030 Agenda.

The Circular economy in Brazil and alignment with the SDGs: Interfaces, gaps and opportunities for future research

“…The possibility of extension of use derives from the design and idealization of the product with the aim of prolonging its life and enabling repairs/remanufacturing (Do et al, 2021). Improving the design of products towards a more efficient model allows for the standardization of processes, which benefits society, especially the base of the pyramid, and reduces the possibility of depletion of sources of resources and scarcity of materials (Mercader-Moyano, Porras-Pereira, & Levinton, 2021).…”

Analysis of the Scientific Evolution of the Circular Economy Applied to Construction and Demolition Waste

“…It is, therefore, essential that the keywords capture both themes from their origins. Notably, the topic of CE creates controversy among researchers [60][61][62] because of its recent development, different definitions and different ways of naming the same topic. According to Blomsma and Brenna [63], the CE theme is based on conventional thinking and has its basis in other themes.…”

Circular Economy Development in the Construction Sector in Japan

“…Previous studies have also acknowledged that (1) CE and the SDGs can also be pr moted in novel contexts, such as emergency housing [49]; (2) social sustainability init tives (e.g., engagement with residents and information about the use of buildings) a largely absent from the design of sustainable settlements, which has a negative influen The implementation of CE in the construction sector requires, for example, reorganization at the system level, changes across the whole of the value chain, and the development of new consumer habits [45]. CE requires a transformation of both production and consumption systems, and implementing CE practices transforms the way companies do business especially in the manufacturing industry [46].…”

“…Previous studies have also acknowledged that (1) CE and the SDGs can also be promoted in novel contexts, such as emergency housing [49]; (2) social sustainability initiatives (e.g., engagement with residents and information about the use of buildings) are largely absent from the design of sustainable settlements, which has a negative influence on both the sustainability of large settlements and the environmental performance of buildings [50];…”