Circles of intellectual discovery in Cambridge and management learning: A discourse analysis of Joan Robinson’s The Economics of Imperfect Competition

Abstract

In this article, we explore a circle of younger-generation economists at Cambridge who contributed to new theories in the 1930s. The aim was to understand how and why innovative thinking in academic theorizing, seen as situated, discursive practices, can emerge and gain ground. We also address how new theory building by an unlikely candidate, Joan Robinson, could unfold. We examine how there was a change in discourse related to imperfect markets and identify forming practices. Our perspective on how knowledge was reframed is Foucauldian. The study is grounded in archive studies, recent reviews and biographical material. This article contributes to learning, knowledge creation and communities of practice by exploring idea innovations as discursive practice. We propose 'epistemic interaction' as a sensitizing concept for understanding new theory building and theorizing in collaborative partnerships and small circles that became key to intellectual discovery.

Ventriloquial Authority in Management Learning and Education: A Communication as Constitutive of Learning and Education Perspective

“…Such theorists often adopt the approach of a master theorist such as Foucault (2007) or Derrida (1976Derrida ( , 1978Derrida ( , 1982 to illuminate what is being enabled and/or suppressed through discourse or apply a pre-existent theory such as feminism (Lucas, D'Enbeau & Heiden, 2016). For example, Jevnaker and Raa (2017) apply Foucauldian analysis to underline the significance of British economist Joan Robinson's work, and Wright, Middleton, Hibbert and Brazil (2020) apply Derridean deconstruction as a method to reveal suppressed themes in managerial discourse. Poststructuralist approaches tend to focus on narratives and ideologies as (becoming) independent of human agency and as having effects on individuals without them having a conscious role in the construction or knowing of them.…”

The Future of Knowledge Work: Working Smarter and Greener in the Age of Digitalization

“…As acknowledged by the telecommunication researchers interviewed, the future changes will include further digital industrialization of knowledge work with data-accumulation and control systems at all levels (Susskind and Susskind, 2016). Through the phase of robotics there will be many people without work, which may press down the wages (see, e.g., Jevnaker & Raa, 2017). Globalization and worker migrations will make the competition for a job stronger.…”

Towards the Dynamic Arts of Reimagining Sustainable Organization

“…The black circle in the lower right corner illustrates this. With "shared" we do not mean that people think similarly, rather they may share engagements in related actions (Richter, 1998) and discourses (Jevnaker & Raa, 2017). Further, at this early stage of the establishment of a team, the influence of new members is faster than it is when the team becomes more established.…”