Circles of analysis: a systemic model of child criminal exploitation

Abstract

Purpose Child criminal exploitation (CCE) emerges from the complex interplay between potential targets, motivated perpetrators and conducive environments. Drawing on contextual safeguarding and rational choice theory. The purpose of this paper is to explain the relational dynamics that lead to CCE in terms of complex systems. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews the existing criminological and public health perspectives on CCE and compare against current assessment protocols used to identify child victims of exploitation. Findings Findings demonstrate a conceptual and empirical flaw in existing practice. This flaw can be understood in terms of a failure to include both environmental conditions and the perpetrator’s motivation when trying to prevent CCE. Research limitations/implications To correct this, this paper develops an original systemic model called circles of analysis. This model builds on contextual safeguarding to overcome this identified flaw by also including perpetrator motivation to develop a Systemic Investigation, Protection and Prosecution Strategy. Practical implications It is worth considering as to whether our model can be scaled up to look at trafficking of children and adults for modern slavery, servitude, forced and compulsory labour in different contexts and jurisdictions. Alongside this, is there capacity to build perpetrator behaviours into the contextual safeguarding model? Social implications The potential for further development and alignment with the principles of contextual safeguarding is tantalising, and it is hoped that the contribution to this important special edition will open up new avenues for collaboration with both academics and practitioners who are concerned with protecting children and combatting CCE. Originality/value This strategy is uniquely designed to improve how police and social workers identify and investigate CCE and safeguard potential victims and survivors.

The UK's Statutory Defence for Victims of Modern Slavery and its Narrow Understanding of Victimhood

“…Once the defence is raised, the defendant comes to simultaneously occupy the position of both a victim (of modern slavery) and a perpetrator (of the crime for which they are raising the defence against), which does not correspond neatly with the reductive, linear logic of the standard processes in the criminal justice system in which a person is understood to be either a victim or a perpetrator. 13 Positively, this position on the burden of proof was challenged in 2018 with the case of MK v R. The trial judges held that the most appropriate approach would be the same as that initially stated by the CPS as summarised above. In their appeal, the applicant submitted that the trial judge misdirected the jury as to the burden and standard of proof.…”

Rational Choices of Labor Workers in Increasing Family Income in Indonesia Forest Fringe Communities

“…Rural communities who do not own or who have little land as the main source of family income will seek additional by becoming laborers. The lack of availability of one's land for work and little and insufficient income to provide for the family requires the people of this group to strive to increase income to meet the basic needs of their families In line with a rational choice theory which explains the behavior of actors using economic "cost-benefit" analysis broadly, landowners also take into account the costs incurred in the provision of salaries so that sometimes workers are given an overpay because if the benefits outweigh the costs, violations will be (Barlow et al, 2021).…”