2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-021-00583-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circadian activity of the fat dormouse Glis glis measured with camera traps at bait stations

Abstract: Monitoring of small nocturnal and arboreal rodents is difficult and often conducted using indirect techniques. Here, we measured the circadian activity of the fat dormouse (Glis glis) directly using camera traps. The study took place at the Spitzberg in SW Germany. Data were collected using six Bushnell Natureview cameras with a macro lens at baited feeding stations. At 14 out of 41 active camera locations, edible dormice occurred. We collected 301 events between 8th July and 5th October 2018. There were 21.5 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent times, camera-trapping has been shown as a reliable method to estimate activity rhythms of wildlife, when a consistent number of records (i.e., over 30) is available for each species [29]. As for small rodents, camera-trapping has been mostly used to study activity patterns of easily identifiable species (e.g., diurnal species [30][31][32] or those showing unmistakable morphological features [33,34]). Conversely, this method has been poorly applied to small ground-dwelling rodents, possibly because of the difficulties in species identification from black/white videos [13,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, camera-trapping has been shown as a reliable method to estimate activity rhythms of wildlife, when a consistent number of records (i.e., over 30) is available for each species [29]. As for small rodents, camera-trapping has been mostly used to study activity patterns of easily identifiable species (e.g., diurnal species [30][31][32] or those showing unmistakable morphological features [33,34]). Conversely, this method has been poorly applied to small ground-dwelling rodents, possibly because of the difficulties in species identification from black/white videos [13,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the first step of the analysis, we removed images of the same species recorded at the same location occurring in < 5 min from our image collection to reduce pseudo-replication bias (Meek et al 2014;Meredith and Ridout 2014). This interval is commonly used in camera trapping studies (e.g., Diete et al 2017;Randler and Kalb 2021) and enabled us to maximise the number of theoretically independent detections allowing more precise estimation of diel activity patterns (Ridout and Linkie 2009). Picture metadata were extracted with TotalCommander software and used to build a database including camera site, species, additional species, and date, and time of each image.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%