1996
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1996.9941742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cinematographical Analysis of Movement Pathway Constraints in Rapid Target-Striking Tasks

Abstract: Several features of the actual movement pathway in two rapid target-striking tasks were quantified by using high-speed cinematography, and whether the movement pathway is constrained as a function of the accuracy demands imposed by the size of the subtended angle was determined. Subjects (N = 16) first hit an 8-cm-diameter target located 10 cm to the left of a start position and then, depending on the condition, moved another 10 cm to hit either a 6-cm- or 1.5-cm-diameter target. Subtended angles were 17.1 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Movement time of the first segment was longer when the target size of the second was reduced (Adam et al 1995;Sidaway et al 1995;Short et al 1996), this finding is in agreement with our results. Sidaway et al (1995) demonstrated that spatial dispersion of movement endpoints around the first target was reduced when the target size of the second movement of the two-segment movement was decreased, thereby increasing the accuracy demand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Movement time of the first segment was longer when the target size of the second was reduced (Adam et al 1995;Sidaway et al 1995;Short et al 1996), this finding is in agreement with our results. Sidaway et al (1995) demonstrated that spatial dispersion of movement endpoints around the first target was reduced when the target size of the second movement of the two-segment movement was decreased, thereby increasing the accuracy demand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Sidaway et al (1995) demonstrated that spatial dispersion of movement endpoints around the first target was reduced when the target size of the second movement of the two-segment movement was decreased, thereby increasing the accuracy demand. Using a similar target size manipulation, Short et al (1996) reported that the movement pathway of the first segment contained less horizontal deviation and higher peak vertical displacement than when the movements were made to larger targets in the second segment. These latter two experiments suggest that the accuracy constraint of the second movement influences how the first segment is prepared and executed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Context effects were observed in drawing line segments with acute angles (Rand and Stelmach 2000;Rand et al 1997;Weiss et al 1997), and in those tasks where reaching a target (Short et al 1996;Sidaway 1991;Sidaway et al 1995) or picking up an object (Gentilucci et al 1997;Marteniuk et al 1987) implied either a sharp change in direction, or an impact on a surface. In all these cases the initiation of one step may be facilitated by a timely use of the elastic energy stored in the muscles while braking the previous step (Guiard 1993, see also Adam et al 1993Meulenbroek and Thomassen 1993).…”
Section: Context Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled planning is basic and essential for the performance of fast complex sequential motor actions (Adam et al, 1995; Fischman & Reeve, 1992; Rand et al, 1997; Rand & Stelmach, 2000; Short, Fischman, & Wang, 1996; Sidaway, Sekiya, & Fairweather, 1995) and especially, when participants are required to attain high spatial accuracy (Ketcham, Seidler, Van Gemmert, & Stelmach, 2002; MacKenzie, Marteniuk, Dugas, Liske, & Eickmeier, 1987; Rand & Stelmach, 2000; Weiss et al, 1997). In object manipulation experiments, a large number of studies have reported evidence of coupled planning depending on the final end-state comfort position for the arm (Rosenbaum & Jorgensen, 1992; Short & Cauraugh, 1997) on the grasp orientation and grasp height (Cohen & Rosenbaum, 2004; for a review see: Rosenbaum, Chapman, Weigelt, Weiss, & van der Wel, 2012), as well as the second action type (Armbrüster & Spijkers, 2006; Johnson-Frey et al, 2004; Marteniuk et al, 1987; Mason, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%