2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2013.6825093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CIM-SDN: A Common Information Model extension for Software-Defined Networking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 introduces the related work to our solution by presenting per work: the reference itself, a brief description of the work, SDN plane in which the solution operates, modeling language used for specifying the management tasks, scope (interdomain vs. intradomain), and status (i.e., implementation: functional deployment in a real network, prototype: a development that serves as a proof of concept, and conceptual: nonimplementation/prototype). From the related work analysis, we remark several facts: first, there are a lot of solutions, such as, previous studies, 2,16,17,19,20,22,41,[45][46][47][48] that consider YANG or CIM for network management, but few of them 2,16,17,22 operate in SDN. Second, some works 12,[23][24][25][26]49,50 employ modeling or policy languages or formal notations for specifying their proposals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 2 introduces the related work to our solution by presenting per work: the reference itself, a brief description of the work, SDN plane in which the solution operates, modeling language used for specifying the management tasks, scope (interdomain vs. intradomain), and status (i.e., implementation: functional deployment in a real network, prototype: a development that serves as a proof of concept, and conceptual: nonimplementation/prototype). From the related work analysis, we remark several facts: first, there are a lot of solutions, such as, previous studies, 2,16,17,19,20,22,41,[45][46][47][48] that consider YANG or CIM for network management, but few of them 2,16,17,22 operate in SDN. Second, some works 12,[23][24][25][26]49,50 employ modeling or policy languages or formal notations for specifying their proposals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Common Information Model (CIM) has been used to represent the Data Plane in a Core Information Model 15 and describe schemes for SDN. 16 The YANG language has been used to convert parameters from the OpenFlow Configuration Protocol (OFConfig) to the Open Virtual Switch DataBase (OVSDB). 17 Also, YANG has been employed for virtualizing software-defined infrastructures, 18 defining databases of configuration, 19 specifying a data model for routing, 20 defining a data model for configuration management, 19 specifying a data model in data center networks, 21 and managing data plane resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the closest related work found in literature to modeling SDN and its applications are Miniedit [14], Virtual Network Descriptor (VND) [15], and Common Information Model for SDN (CIM-SDN) [16]. The Miniedit and VND refers to the creation of virtual topologies in SDN through a graphical interface.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses the CIM-SDN [14], which is a CIM extension that allows the representation of SDN elements in a UML diagram, ensuring the consistency the network. It also maintains an updated documentation for easy understanding.…”
Section: Flow Proxy Manager (Fpm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better structure the display and use of NVP, an CIM extension (Common Information Model) was developed to allow modeling of SDN using UML (Unified Modeling Language) [14].…”
Section: Network Virtualization Proxy (Nvp)mentioning
confidence: 99%