/mL versus 23,1x10 6 /mL; p=0,07), motilidade (45,2 versus 48,1%; p=0,08) e morfologia (6,1 versus 6,4%; p=0,09) entre os grupos de pacientes com infertilidade primária e secundária. Conclusões: a análise seminal deve ser solicitada mesmo em casos de fertilidade masculina prévia. Os médicos não devem presumir que um paciente possui uma análise seminal normal, baseados no fato de este possuir história de estabelecimento de uma gravidez no passado.
PALAVRA-CHAVE:Infertilidade masculina; Semen/análise; Fertilidade; Contagem de espermatozóides Abstract Purpose: to determine if the previous fertility history can predict current fertility status of a patient examined for couple's infertility. Methods: retrospective study involving semen analyses from 183 consecutive subfertile patients evaluated from September 2002 to March 2004. We excluded those patients who had undergone radio or chemotherapy, orchiectomy or vasectomy. Mean values of all analyses were used for patients with multiple semen analysis. Patients with more than 20x10 6 sperm/mL, motility higher than 50% and with normal strict sperm morphology higher than 14% were considered normal. Patients were divided into two groups, according to the fertility status: primary infertility (118 patients) and secondary infertility (65 patients). Data were analyzed according to the 2 test and the Student t-test. Results: no differences were detected in the mean age between patients with primary infertility, 37.3 6.3, and secondary infertility, 38.1 5.9; p=0.08. In the group of patients with primary infertility, 51.9% (61 patients) had a normal sperm concentration, 70.3% (83 patients) had normal sperm motility and 26.3% (31 patients) had normal sperm morphology. In the group of patients with secondary infertility, 53.8% (35 patients) had normal sperm concentration, 75.4% (49 patients) had normal sperm motility and 32.3%Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006; 28(11): 652-7.