Ciência aberta, dados abertos: desafio e oportunidade

Abstract

Today, one of the main narratives in science is making access to research data universal, especially studies funded with public resources, a common motivation that underlies the open access to scientific information movement that began in the late 1990s. Without losing sight of the fact that the opening of research data in Brazil is part of a recent discussion, its implementation is necessary, not only because this has to do with offering open access to the outcomes of public funding, but also to meeting the commitment to do science under the inspiration of an open philosophy, supported by the infinite possibilities of information and communication technologies, which encourage collaborative, shared production among researchers, especially through the reuse of data. In December 2017, after the 8th Luso-Brazilian Open Access Conference, which was held at its premises in Rio de Janeiro, the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz) gave another unequivocal demonstration of its commitment to Open Science when it presented the Open science and open data: Mapping and analysis of policies, infrastructures, and strategies from a national and international perspective (Santos, Henning e Almeida, 2017) report on an analysis of international initiatives on policies, governance, and open data infrastructures as a result of the research carried out by the Working Group on Open Science, which has ties to the office of the vice president for Education, Information and Communication, in partnership with the Center for the Integration of Data and Knowledge in Health (Cidacs). The Cidacs, which is based in Fiocruz Bahia, is part of one of the institutional strategies to subsidize the formulation and implementation of a policy that guides the opening of scientific data. It conducts research, develops new investigative methodologies, and promotes professional and scientific training based on interdisciplinary projects grounded on the integration of large databases (big data) to expand the understanding of the population's health issues and to provide evidence to support decision-making in public policies. This study systematizes the experience of eight countries-Germany, Australia, Brazil, Canada, the United States, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United Kingdom-and the initiatives promoted by the European Commission through its Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program to open data to society, aiming at the advancement of an open, collaborative, and shared science that guarantees the integrity of research and is coordinated with the social and economic sustainability of the nations. The Open science and open data: Mapping and analysis of policies, infrastructures, and strategies from a national and international perspective report is a part of the "

Scientific journals: guidelines for creating a data collection

“…"Added to these is the growing need to use technologies and methods based on artificial intelligence to analyze data, which is increasingly becoming too voluminous to be analyzed, inspected directly or supervised by people" (Laender et al, 2020, p. 12), and difficulties related to the culture of scientists "such as the resistance of researchers to hand over their data for fear of losing the priority of discoveries" Guanaes, 2018).…”

Políticas de abertura de dados de periódicos científicos

“…No contexto da Ciência Aberta, a democratização do conhecimento científico é um dos princípios basilares (UNESCO, 2022). Sobre os periódicos científicos, já é comum que se pratique o Acesso Aberto, agora, se movimentam para a abertura dos dados adjacentes aos manuscritos que publicam (Santos et al, 2017).…”

Análise Socioeconômica Das Mães De Recém-Nascidos Com Espinha Bífida: Estudo No Repositório De Saúde Estadual

“…A constante evolução da ciência permite o desenvolvimento de novas maneiras de se obter, armazenar e analisar dados de pesquisas, possibilitando progressivamente o uso cada vez mais contínuo de tecnologias que favoreçam o acesso à informação de forma simplificada (Shitanku, 2016). Santos et. al.…”