2006
DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872006000300006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cicatriz renal detectada mediante cintigrama renal DMSA en niños con primera pielonefritis aguda: estudio de factores de riesgo

Abstract: Renal scars after one year of follow up in children with a first episode of acute pyelonephritis (Rev Méd Chile 2006; 134: 305-11).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
0
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
0
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies could not show these relationships [17,18,19,20]. In our study, we detected renal scarring in 19.4% of the patients, which is again compatible with the literature (18% after an initial UTI) [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, other studies could not show these relationships [17,18,19,20]. In our study, we detected renal scarring in 19.4% of the patients, which is again compatible with the literature (18% after an initial UTI) [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Studies have shown that the CRP is significantly higher at the time of admission when renal damage is detected using DMSA scintigraphy following pyelonephritis. [21][22][23][24] Likewise, in the present study, more renal scars were detected in patients with positive CRP values, with a statistically significant difference being found between such patients and those with negative CRP values (p<0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Según los estudios, el valor de PCR es significativamente más alto al momento del ingreso cuando se detecta daño renal por gammagrafía con DMSA tras una pielonefritis. [21][22][23][24] Del mismo modo, en este estudio, se detectó mayor nefroesclerosis en los pacientes con valores positivos de PCR, y se halló una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre estos pacientes y aquellos con valores negativos de PCR (p < 0,0001).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified