2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2010.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronometry and formation pathways of gypsum using Electron Spin Resonance and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using ESR, Mathew et al (2004) established reactivation of KHF at ~70 ka based on model ESR ages of gypsum precipitation along the fault plane from Satpura Dungar in the Katrol Hill Range (KHR). This is recalculated as ~56 ka using improved alpha efficiency values (Nagar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ESR, Mathew et al (2004) established reactivation of KHF at ~70 ka based on model ESR ages of gypsum precipitation along the fault plane from Satpura Dungar in the Katrol Hill Range (KHR). This is recalculated as ~56 ka using improved alpha efficiency values (Nagar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also dependent on the residual aluminosilicate framework, which determines the chemical degradation of polymerized gel and their mechanical strength. The assignments of all IR peaks and shoulders are based on the references 26–29 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ikeya et al, 1997;Nagar et al, 2010;Mahan and Kay, 2012). Here, we have used the average U, Th and K contents of six gypsum samples from South Australia (U = 0.12 ± 0.03 ppm, Th = 0.17 ± 0.04 ppm, K = 0.63 ± 0.12%) as reported by Nagar et al (2010) to calculate the gamma dose rate of gypsum layers in our core.…”
Section: S22 Correction For Gamma Dose Rate Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%