2017
DOI: 10.4312/dp.44.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronology and development of the Chalcolithic necropolis of Varna I

Abstract: -In the following paper, we present the main results of our now completed studies of the Varna I cemetery, based on the excavations undertaken by Ivan Ivanov in the years [1972][1973][1974][1975][1976][1977][1978][1979][1980][1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987][1988][1989][1990][1991]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there are very few archaeological signs of the existence of specialized fighters or warriors (Schulting 2013). Potential specialized weapons in male burials began to appear more frequently in the form of shaft-hole axes only in the fifth millennium, after 4750 BC during the Late Neolithic in some regions of southeast Europe (Osztás et al 2016;Zalai-Gaál et al 2012), most notably in the form of copper axes during the middle of the fifth millennium during Copper Age in the Carpathian Basin and the Balkans (Bognár-Kutzián 1963;Krauß et al 2017). However, the popularity of such copper shaft-hole axes ceased after the fifth millennium, and it was only by the second half of the fourth millennium BC that specialized weapons in the form of battle axes, daggers, and halberds (i.e., daggers shafted like axes, see Dolfini et al 2018;Horn 2018) became more frequent.…”
Section: The Third Millennium Bc Social Transformation In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there are very few archaeological signs of the existence of specialized fighters or warriors (Schulting 2013). Potential specialized weapons in male burials began to appear more frequently in the form of shaft-hole axes only in the fifth millennium, after 4750 BC during the Late Neolithic in some regions of southeast Europe (Osztás et al 2016;Zalai-Gaál et al 2012), most notably in the form of copper axes during the middle of the fifth millennium during Copper Age in the Carpathian Basin and the Balkans (Bognár-Kutzián 1963;Krauß et al 2017). However, the popularity of such copper shaft-hole axes ceased after the fifth millennium, and it was only by the second half of the fourth millennium BC that specialized weapons in the form of battle axes, daggers, and halberds (i.e., daggers shafted like axes, see Dolfini et al 2018;Horn 2018) became more frequent.…”
Section: The Third Millennium Bc Social Transformation In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in 1986 essentially the same (Chi-squared) method was applied to stratified 14 C-ages from Tell Dipsis (Bulgaria), Niederwil (Switzerland) and Arslantepe (Turkey), as well as to historically seriated 14 C-data from the Egyptian 1 st Dynasty [33]. An important drawback of these earliest applications, however, was the difficulty in determining the statistical uncertainties of the dating results, but which can be overcome by including a Monte-Carlo simulation of the different error sources [34]. Hence, despite a steadily increasing number of extensions and modifications applied over the years (e.g.…”
Section: Stratigraphic 14 C-based Age-depth Modelling At Sindosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, despite a steadily increasing number of extensions and modifications applied over the years (e.g. [1] [2] [3] [34]), the GMWCM-procedure is still today based on essentially the same method as it was, some 30 years ago. As illustrated (schematically) in Eq (1), the approach taken is to minimize the statistical distance (on the 14 C-scale) between the discretely measured sequence of tree-ring (or archaeological) samples that have 14 C-ages D i ± σ(D) i [BP], but unknown calendric ages, and the continuous (e.g.…”
Section: Stratigraphic 14 C-based Age-depth Modelling At Sindosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six dates were performed on bulk samples less than 1 cm thick collected along the peat at intervals of 20 cm. The seventh date was performed on a wood sample taken at a depth of 2.40 m. For age-depth modeling, we applied the method of Gaussian Monte Carlo Wiggle Matching (GMCWM) (Benz et al, 2012; Krauß et al, 2017; Weninger et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%