2021
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic prepartum light-dark phase shifts in cattle disrupt circadian clocks, decrease insulin sensitivity and mammary development, and are associated with lower milk yield through 60 days postpartum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were collected from 16 multiparous cows with 2.88 ± 0.91 lactations, a previous lactation milk yield of 12,277 ± 3460 kg, and a body weight of 752 ± 66 kg at five weeks BEC. In both experiments, cows were blocked by lactation number, previous lactation yield, and number of disease events (hyperketonemia, mastitis, hypocalcemia, metritis, retained placenta, and displaced abomasum; data previously reported [ 15 , 16 ]) during the previous lactation, into one of two treatments—control (CON) or phase shift (PS) at 35 d BEC. From 35 d BEC through calving, CON animals received a consistent timing of 16 h of light and 8 h of dark every day, whereas PS cows received the same amount of light in a 6 h forward shift of the photophase every 3 d. Then from calving through 60 DIM, all cattle received the CON light–dark cycle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data were collected from 16 multiparous cows with 2.88 ± 0.91 lactations, a previous lactation milk yield of 12,277 ± 3460 kg, and a body weight of 752 ± 66 kg at five weeks BEC. In both experiments, cows were blocked by lactation number, previous lactation yield, and number of disease events (hyperketonemia, mastitis, hypocalcemia, metritis, retained placenta, and displaced abomasum; data previously reported [ 15 , 16 ]) during the previous lactation, into one of two treatments—control (CON) or phase shift (PS) at 35 d BEC. From 35 d BEC through calving, CON animals received a consistent timing of 16 h of light and 8 h of dark every day, whereas PS cows received the same amount of light in a 6 h forward shift of the photophase every 3 d. Then from calving through 60 DIM, all cattle received the CON light–dark cycle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 35 d BEC through calving, CON animals received a consistent timing of 16 h of light and 8 h of dark every day, whereas PS cows received the same amount of light in a 6 h forward shift of the photophase every 3 d. Then from calving through 60 DIM, all cattle received the CON light–dark cycle. Further details on CON and PS treatments, experimental procedures, and power analysis for this study design are available in our previous manuscripts [ 15 , 16 ]. No differences in LDT or BFT changes were observed between CON and PS cattle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feed was delivered to all cows for an expected 10% refusals at~1600 h. Once animals calved, they were milked twice each day at 0500 h and 1600 h. Cows exposed to the PS treatment produced less milk per day as compared with the CON, through 60-DIM. Details of the barn, separation of treatments for light exposures and shifting phases, and study outcomes have been described in extensive detail in our previous publication [11]. A graphical schematic of the experimental design is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Animal Management and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for light exposures and shifting phases, and study outcomes have been described in extensive detail in our previous publication [11]. A graphical schematic of the experimental design is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Animal Management and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation