1982
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(82)90041-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The waveform morphology is similar to the single and multichannel implant recordings reported by other authors (Game et al, 1987;Gardi, 1985;Miyamoto, 1986;Starr & Brackmann, 1979;Stypulkowski et al, 1986;Walsh & Leake-Jones, 1982). With a multichannel implant, it is possible to stimulate various portions of the cochlea (e.g., basal versus apical) independently as noted by Gardi (1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The waveform morphology is similar to the single and multichannel implant recordings reported by other authors (Game et al, 1987;Gardi, 1985;Miyamoto, 1986;Starr & Brackmann, 1979;Stypulkowski et al, 1986;Walsh & Leake-Jones, 1982). With a multichannel implant, it is possible to stimulate various portions of the cochlea (e.g., basal versus apical) independently as noted by Gardi (1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The findings of suggest that the slope of the EMLR input/output function in guinea pigs treated with ototoxic drugs predicts the survival of VIIIth nerve ganglion cells. In another study employing cats, Walsh and Leake-Jones (1982) reported that the input-output function of the EABR was more sensitive than threshold measurements to the anatomical degradation within the cochlea resulting from chronic electrical stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These responses reflect activity from the eighth nerve and brainstem (Jewett and Williston, 1971;Møller and Jannetta, 1985). They have been used to estimate spiral ganglion cell survival (Simmons and Smith, 1983;Walsh and Leake-Jones, 1982) and evaluate the critical synchronous components of neural encoding at the periphery of the auditory neural pathway. Wave I cannot be seen in cochlear implant recipients since it has a latency of approximatively 0.35 ms (as seen in recordings of the electrically evoked action potential, Abbas et al, 1998;Franck and Norton, 2001) and is embedded in stimulus artifact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible difference would be in the changes to the auditory neural periphery resulting from the implant surgery. For instance, the electrode array might become encapsulated in fibrous tissue after implantation (Kawano et al, 1998;Li et al, 1999;Walsh et al, 1982). Our study demonstrated the stability in ECAP measurements by comparing the ECAP thresholds intra-operatively and postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%