2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic effects of cannabis use on the human reward system: An fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
157
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
157
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This model proposes that reward circuitry is hyperactive during OC compulsions and hypoactive during natural reward processing, as is reported in substance addiction disorders (Martin-Soelch, Missimer, Leenders & Schultz, 2003;Van Hell et al, 2010). Figee et al (2011) reported that during reward anticipation OCD patients showed attenuated activation of the left insula, left vlPFC and nucleus ac- cumbens (NAcc), which are all critical constituents of the reward circuit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model proposes that reward circuitry is hyperactive during OC compulsions and hypoactive during natural reward processing, as is reported in substance addiction disorders (Martin-Soelch, Missimer, Leenders & Schultz, 2003;Van Hell et al, 2010). Figee et al (2011) reported that during reward anticipation OCD patients showed attenuated activation of the left insula, left vlPFC and nucleus ac- cumbens (NAcc), which are all critical constituents of the reward circuit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannabis users showed enhanced reward anticipation activity in the middle temporal gyrus bilaterally, right cuneus and right parahippocampal gyrus. When compared to tobacco-smoking controls, cannabis users also showed reduced anticipation activity in the same areas, with the exception of the nucleus accumbens bilaterally, the right medial frontal gyrus and the left cingulated gyrus, indicating that anticipation activity in these regions may be attenuated by both cannabis and nicotine [176]. In accordance with Nestor et al (2010) [175], response to contrasted outcome notification was associated with greater activity in the putamen bilaterally and the right caudate nucleus compared with non-smoking controls [176].…”
Section: Memorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When compared to tobacco-smoking controls, cannabis users also showed reduced anticipation activity in the same areas, with the exception of the nucleus accumbens bilaterally, the right medial frontal gyrus and the left cingulated gyrus, indicating that anticipation activity in these regions may be attenuated by both cannabis and nicotine [176]. In accordance with Nestor et al (2010) [175], response to contrasted outcome notification was associated with greater activity in the putamen bilaterally and the right caudate nucleus compared with non-smoking controls [176]. The putamen was more activated in cannabis users than in nonsmokers and tobacco-smoking controls, indicating that changes in this area were mainly due to cannabis use [176].…”
Section: Memorymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations