2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic cocaine exposure in adolescence: Effects on spatial discrimination reversal, delay discounting, and performance on fixed-ratio schedules in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During preliminary training, estimates of magnitude sensitivity were similar for all groups both before (range of s M : 0.28 – 0.39) and after (range of s M : 0.34 – 0.46) the larger reinforcer was switched to the opposite lever, suggesting there was no bias for responding on one lever over another. Magnitude-sensitivity estimates at the end of preliminary training also were similar across exposure groups (range of s M : .33 – .42), and these are similar to previous studies using C57Bl/6 mice (Pope et al, 2016, 2015). For reference, a magnitude sensitivity of 0.4 corresponds to 10 0.4 = 2.5 times as many responses on the preferred alternative.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During preliminary training, estimates of magnitude sensitivity were similar for all groups both before (range of s M : 0.28 – 0.39) and after (range of s M : 0.34 – 0.46) the larger reinforcer was switched to the opposite lever, suggesting there was no bias for responding on one lever over another. Magnitude-sensitivity estimates at the end of preliminary training also were similar across exposure groups (range of s M : .33 – .42), and these are similar to previous studies using C57Bl/6 mice (Pope et al, 2016, 2015). For reference, a magnitude sensitivity of 0.4 corresponds to 10 0.4 = 2.5 times as many responses on the preferred alternative.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Human and nonhuman adolescence are both marked by deficits in executive functioning and maladaptive decision making that may persist into adulthood after exposure to drugs or toxicants (Chambers & Potenza, 2003; Hefner & Holmes, 2007; Laviola, Macrì, Morley-Fletcher, & Adriani, 2003; Marco et al, 2011; Pope, Boomhower, Hutsell, Teixeira, & Newland, 2016). In rodent models, the adolescent period is considered to be wholly encompassed by the age range of postnatal day (PND) 21 through 59 (Laviola et al, 2003; Spear, 2007a; Tirelli, Laviola, & Adriani, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDR procedure (Pope et al, 2016) proceeded in three phases: original discrimination (OD), first reversal (R1), and second reversal (R2). In the OD, sessions comprised 60 trials separated by a 10-sec ITI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess reversal learning, we employed a spatial-discrimination-reversal (SDR) procedure (Pope et al, 2016) in which the spatial location of a lever (e.g., left or right) predicted reinforcement. Attentional-set shifting (i.e., an extradimensional shift) was assessed using a spatial-to-visual discrimination procedure (Paletz et al, 2007) in which the spatial location of a lever no longer predicted reinforcement and instead an illuminated stimulus light above a lever did.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This last point is very important due raise rates of drug use in Mexican adolescents (Villatoro et al, 2017). And the fact that the drug use in adolescence affects executive functions in adulthood (Pope, Boomhower, Hutsell, Teixeira, & Newland, 2016). We need future research using the APSD test to verify the screening performance to make it a useful tool in schools and clinical centers.…”
Section: Quantity Of Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%