2014
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Care Model Strategies In The United States And Germany Deliver Patient-Centered, High-Quality Diabetes Care

Abstract: Improving the quality of care for chronic diseases is an important issue for most health care systems in industrialized nations. One widely adopted approach is the Chronic Care Model (CCM), which was first developed in the late 1990s. In this article we present the results from two large surveys in the United States and Germany that report patients' experiences in different models of patient-centered diabetes care, compared to the experiences of patients who received routine diabetes care in the same systems. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…65 One way that stakeholders have significantly improved quality of care for people with diseases related to obesity (eg, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease) is by shifting treatment paradigms to be more patient-centred, focusing on each patient's preferences, values and needs. 2,3,9,[68][69][70][71] While there are several accurate and informative models of obesity that have been developed by leading experts and medical societies, 17,18,22,[72][73][74] truly patient-centric models are lacking. Thus, the current initiative was undertaken to develop a patient-centred obesity disease-illness model and to issue a call to action to obesity stakeholders to utilize this model to promote activities outlined in As new treatments are studied for obesity management, a disease-illness model for obesity, such as the one presented here, can BOX 2 Calls to action to improve patient-centred care for people living with obesity 62,65,75 Healthcare providers…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 One way that stakeholders have significantly improved quality of care for people with diseases related to obesity (eg, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease) is by shifting treatment paradigms to be more patient-centred, focusing on each patient's preferences, values and needs. 2,3,9,[68][69][70][71] While there are several accurate and informative models of obesity that have been developed by leading experts and medical societies, 17,18,22,[72][73][74] truly patient-centric models are lacking. Thus, the current initiative was undertaken to develop a patient-centred obesity disease-illness model and to issue a call to action to obesity stakeholders to utilize this model to promote activities outlined in As new treatments are studied for obesity management, a disease-illness model for obesity, such as the one presented here, can BOX 2 Calls to action to improve patient-centred care for people living with obesity 62,65,75 Healthcare providers…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Zintegrowane, usystematyzowane podejście do leczenia AF, które z powodzeniem zastosowano w innych dziedzinach medycyny [322][323][324], ułatwi spójne, zgodne z wytycznymi postępowanie u wszystkich pacjentów [325] (ryc. 6), stwarzając szansę poprawy klinicznych wyników leczenia [42,326,327].…”
Section: Zintegrowane Postępowanie U Pacjentów Z Migotaniem Przedsionkówunclassified
“…6 According to Edwards et al, 7 The PCMH shares many elements with other international performance management programs that aim to improve quality of care through data, changed practice organization, and payment reform, including the Quality and Qutcomes Framework in the United Kingdom 8 or the disease-management programs in Germany. 9 Scholars from the United Kingdom and the United States have raised concerns that performance management systems may exacerbate disparities in particular if the income of providers in underprivileged communities declines because of lower-quality scores and providers start to avoid patients with minority background or low socioeconomic status. 10,11 However, they also acknowledge that well-designed programs may be able to reduce inequalities if, for example, absolute quality scores and relative improvement are rewarded, if quality measures are risk-adjusted or stratified, and if effects on disparities are part of the program evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%