2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-008-1262-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome evolution in the subtribe Bovina (Mammalia, Bovidae): The karyotype of the Cambodian banteng (Bos javanicus birmanicus) suggests that Robertsonian translocations are related to interspecific hybridization

Abstract: Three subspecies of banteng (Bos javanicus) have been described: B. j. javanicus in Java, B. j. lowi in Borneo, and B. j. birmanicus in Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam. In this paper we provide the first description of the karyotype of the Cambodian banteng. The chromosomal complement of B. j. birmanicus differs from that of B. j. javanicus, which was previously found to be similar to that of cattle, Bos taurus (2n = 60). The Cambodian banteng karyotype has a diploid number of 2n = 56 (FN = 62… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The whole chromosome 1 of mithun (B. frontalis) in this study was equivalent to B. taurus chromosomes 2 and 28 (Chi et al, 2005). Two pronounced red signals were seen in the karyotypes of mithun, and three red signals in the hybrids of mithun x Brahman, while four red signals in Brahman cattle ( Figure 4A-D), in good agreement with the centric fusion of bovine rob(2;28) (Gallagher Jr. and Womack, 1992;Chi et al, 2005;Ropiquet et al, 2008), and exclusive rob(1;29) due to very low incidence of rob(1;29) in Brahman cattle (De Luca et al, 2002).…”
Section: Fish Analysissupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The whole chromosome 1 of mithun (B. frontalis) in this study was equivalent to B. taurus chromosomes 2 and 28 (Chi et al, 2005). Two pronounced red signals were seen in the karyotypes of mithun, and three red signals in the hybrids of mithun x Brahman, while four red signals in Brahman cattle ( Figure 4A-D), in good agreement with the centric fusion of bovine rob(2;28) (Gallagher Jr. and Womack, 1992;Chi et al, 2005;Ropiquet et al, 2008), and exclusive rob(1;29) due to very low incidence of rob(1;29) in Brahman cattle (De Luca et al, 2002).…”
Section: Fish Analysissupporting
confidence: 71%
“…FISH protocol was performed essentially as described by Ropiquet et al (2008), Peng et al (2010), and Mao et al (2010). The probe was denaturated at 70°C for 10 min, and annealing was done for 30 min at 37°C.…”
Section: Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (Fish)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the BGA1, the paracentric inversion occurring in the qarm (homoeologous to BTA1) has radically differentiated this biarmed chromosome from that of the rob(1;29) of cattle. This paracentric inversion differentiated also gaur chromosome 1q from the homoeologous 1q in both Bos frontalis readei and Bos javanicus birmanicus, the latter two species having their q-arms similar to the BTA1 (Ropiquet et al 2008). CBG-banding (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…3). Same chromosomes (and centric fusions) are involved in Bos frontalis readei and Bos javanicus birmanicus (Ropiquet et al 2008). the homoeologous BTA2 and BTA28 originating BGA2 were also found in the Indian gaur (Bos gaurus) (Gallagher and Womack, 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, the Protein-Kinase C1 gene tree (Supplementary Figure 1) places P. capreolus within the Redunca clade (with 77% bootstrap support) and, given the similar Y chromosome FISH patterns (Figure 3), one may speculate that these shared characters reflect introgressive hybridization in their distant past, although there is no modern evidence to suggest this (in captive settings or in the wild). It is significant, however, that hybridization has been recorded among many species of bovids (Gray, 1972) and has been suggested as a reason for phylogenetic discordance between the mtDNA and nuclear genomes (see Hassanin and Ropiquet, 2007;Ropiquet et al, 2008;Robinson and Ropiquet, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%