A general scheme of chromosome alterations occurring during tumor progression is proposed from the cytogenetic study of 113 breast carcinomas. For 76 of these tumors, chromosome numbers and rate of chromosome rearrangements were correlated with DNA content studied by flow cytometry. A series of 536 cases was used as control for flow cytometry. The following evolution can be proposed: 1. occurrence of unbalanced rearrangements decreasing chromosome number and DNA content; 2. correlatively to the rate of chromosome rearrangements, formation of endoreduplications leading to hyperploid sidelines; 3. persistence of the near diploid cells and decrease of chromosome number to about 35 and of DNA index to .85; 4. more frequently, elimination of the near diploid cells and complete passage to hyperploidy; 5. further losses of chromosomes in the hyperploid tumors, whose karyotypes can decrease to about 55 chromosomes and a DNA index of 1.35; 6. eventually, occurrence of a second endoreduplication, leading to an apparent near tetraploidy. The rate of rearranged chromosomes may reach 80% in both near diploid tumors with 35-40 and hyperploid tumors with 55-65 chromosomes which can be regarded as those with the highest degree of tumor progression. It is shown that the increase of chromosome number and DNA index above diploidy is very limited, and that all tumors with more than 50 chromosomes and 1.35 DNA content passed through endoreduplication. This results in many possible losses of heterozygosity in these cases.
A modified comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) technique was applied to a series of 17 primary breast carcinomas in which cytogenetic study (CG) demonstrated the presence of homogeneously staining region(s), suggesting the occurrence of DNA amplification. mCGH demonstrated recurrent amplifications of the whole chromosome arms 8q (9 times) and 1q (7 times) and of DNA loci in the following bands: 11q13 (6 times), 9p13 and 17q21.1 (4 times), 1q21.1 and 16p11.2 (3 times), and 8q22, 8q24.1, 10q22, 15q26, 17q23, and 20q13.3 (twice). Amplification of whole chromosome arms is likely to have resulted from unbalanced translocations or isochromosomes, whereas amplifications of smaller chromosomal segments probably arose through real DNA amplification processes. In all tumors but one, more than one amplified locus was detected. The fact that many chromosomal sites were involved suggests that the process of amplification is complex and that many genes are potential targets.
The karyotypes of 28 specimens belonging to 26 species of Cercopithecinae have been compared with each other and with human karyotype by chromosome banding and, for some of them, by Zoo-FISH (human painting probes) techniques. The study includes the first description of the karyotypes of four species and a synonym of Cercopithecus nictitans. The chromosomal homologies obtained provide us with new data on a large number of rearrangements. This allows us to code chromosomal characters to draw Cercopithecini phylogenetic trees, which are compared to phylogenetic data based on DNA sequences. Our findings show that some of the superspecies proposed by Kingdon (1997 The Kingdon Field Guide to African Mammals, Academic Press.) and Groves (2001 Primates Taxonomy, Smithsonian Institution Press) do not form homogeneous groups and that the genus Cercopithecus is paraphyletic, in agreement with previous molecular analyses. The evolution of Cercopithecini karyotypes is mainly due to non-centromeric chromosome fissions and centromeric shifts or inversions. Non-Robertsonian translocations occurred in C. hamlyni and C. neglectus. The position of chromosomal rearrangements in the phylogenetic tree leads us to propose that the Cercopithecini evolution proceeded by either repeated fission events facilitated by peculiar genomic structures or successive reticulate phases, in which heterozygous populations for few rearranged chromosomes were present, allowing the spreading of chromosomal forms in various combinations, before the speciation process.
BackgroundAlpha satellite is the major repeated DNA element of primate centromeres. Evolution of these tandemly repeated sequences has led to the existence of numerous families of monomers exhibiting specific organizational patterns. The limited amount of information available in non-human primates is a restriction to the understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of alpha satellite DNA.ResultsWe carried out the targeted high-throughput sequencing of alpha satellite monomers and dimers from the Cercopithecus solatus genome, an Old World monkey from the Cercopithecini tribe. Computational approaches were used to infer the existence of sequence families and to study how these families are organized with respect to each other. While previous studies had suggested that alpha satellites in Old World monkeys were poorly diversified, our analysis provides evidence for the existence of at least four distinct families of sequences within the studied species and of higher order organizational patterns. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using oligonucleotide probes that are able to target each family in a specific way showed that the different families had distinct distributions on chromosomes and were not homogeneously distributed between chromosomes.ConclusionsOur new approach provides an unprecedented and comprehensive view of the diversity and organization of alpha satellites in a species outside the hominoid group. We consider these data with respect to previously known alpha satellite families and to potential mechanisms for satellite DNA evolution. Applying this approach to other species will open new perspectives regarding the integration of satellite DNA into comparative genomic and cytogenetic studies.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3246-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Two-color fluorescent in situ hybridizations using probes for alphoid (alpha) and classical satellite (CS) DNAs from chromosomes 1 and 16 were performed to characterize i(1q), der(1;16), and complex rearrangements observed in breast cancer cells from fresh tumors and established cell lines. Six of seven i(1q) occurred after breakage in the alpha 1 containing region and one of seven was dicentric, with breakage in 1p11.2. The five der(1;16)(q10;p10) studied appeared to result from a variety of breakpoints involving alpha 1, alpha 16, CS1, and CS16 DNAs. All had conserved alpha 16 DNA, suggesting a segregation of the der(1;16) leading to a loss of 16q and a gain of 1q in most cases. One complex rearrangement of chromosome 1 also appeared to involve chromosome 16, suggesting that a der(1;16) occurred first, followed by another rearrangement. Both the apparent preferential involvement of constitutive heterochromatin harboring alpha and CS DNAs and the variety of breakpoints spanning along heterochromatin suggest that the important consequence of the rearrangement is not the breakage per se but the resulting imbalance.
A modified comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) technique was used to identify and map amplified DNA sequences in six homogeneously staining regions (hsr) from three primary breast carcinomas. Five different chromosomal regions and bands were identified as sites of amplification: 8p1, 17q21.1, 17q23 (two cases), 19q13.3, and 20q13.3. The mCGH site located on 17q21.1 was demonstrated to correspond to a 50-100-fold amplification of ERBB2. Further in situ hybridization experiments were used to confirm the mCGH results and to characterize the organization of the amplified sequences within the hsr. In five of six instances, two or more chromosomal regions were found amplified in the same hsr. In the tumor with the less modified karyotype, the two hsr comprised DNA sequences from three different chromosomes and showed different patterns of amplification. In the tumor with the most rearranged karyotype, the hsr-carrying chromosomes were formed by the translocation and amplification of sequences from three or four different chromosomal sites. This illustrates the complexity of the amplification process in breast cancers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.