1991
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-88260-8.50032-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal Variation and Evolution in the Genus Lilium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Levan et al (1964) method, the karyotype formula was determined to be 2m+8sm+6ac+8st for L. ledebourii and 2m+8ac+14st for L. longiflorum. This result is consistent with previous reports on L. longiflorum (Noda 1991, Lim et al 2001, Inceer et al 2002. Analysis of variance (Table 1) indicated that the long and short arm lengths and the arms ratio index were significantly different between the L. ledebourii and L. longiflorum.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Based on Levan et al (1964) method, the karyotype formula was determined to be 2m+8sm+6ac+8st for L. ledebourii and 2m+8ac+14st for L. longiflorum. This result is consistent with previous reports on L. longiflorum (Noda 1991, Lim et al 2001, Inceer et al 2002. Analysis of variance (Table 1) indicated that the long and short arm lengths and the arms ratio index were significantly different between the L. ledebourii and L. longiflorum.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…2). Noda (1991) had already concluded the main aspect of karyotype evolution in Lilium as accumulation of numerous small structural chromosome changes. Such changes produced various chromosome features like amount and location of secondary constrictions or intercalary satellites were found useful in taxonomic researches in our study.…”
Section: Karyotype Evolution On Section Level Of Lilium (Including Nomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the lacking of phylogenetic framework making the karyotype evolution not so clear on the genus level of Lilieae, and this need further research. Noda (1991) suggested the major differences among species of the genus Lilium corresponded to the number and position of secondary constrictions (SCs) and the activity of nuclear organization regions (NORs). He concluding about the type of speciation in the genus Lilium, which included long-term accumulation of numerous small structural chromosome changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lilium species have attracted much attention in cytological respect since they have almost the biggest genome size in the plant kingdom (Peruzzi et al 2009). Many studies have been conducted all over the world (Stewart 1947, Smyth et al 1989, Noda 1991, Siljak‐Yakovlev et al 2003, Muratović et al 2005, 2010a). Noda (1991) suggested that the major differences among species of the genus Lilium correspond to the number and position of secondary constrictions (SCs) and the activity of nuclear organization regions (NORs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted all over the world (Stewart 1947, Smyth et al 1989, Noda 1991, Siljak‐Yakovlev et al 2003, Muratović et al 2005, 2010a). Noda (1991) suggested that the major differences among species of the genus Lilium correspond to the number and position of secondary constrictions (SCs) and the activity of nuclear organization regions (NORs). Based on this, he draw conclusions about the process of speciation in the genus, which included long‐term accumulation of numerous small structural chromosome changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%