1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00121451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal sexing of the Black Shouldered Kite (Elanus caeruleus) (Aves: Accipitridae)

Abstract: The karyotypes of a male and female Black Shouldered Kite (Elanus caeruleus) are presented and their position in the Accipitridae discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…has increased from 106 to 116. The karyological data on this speciespresented by Harris & Walters (1982) differ slightly from our result. They have reported the diploid count to be 64, while we find it invariably to be 66.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…has increased from 106 to 116. The karyological data on this speciespresented by Harris & Walters (1982) differ slightly from our result. They have reported the diploid count to be 64, while we find it invariably to be 66.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In some trees either Milvus or Pernis could represent an independent lineage in which an ancestral karyotype has been retained. A third kite, Elanus caeruleus, was found to possess a karyotype that differs considerably from those of Milvus and Pernis (Kaul & Ansari, 1976;Harris & Waiters, 1982). This species was reported to lack satellited chromosomes (Harris and Waiters), but this observation should be confirmed by studying metaphases with elongated chromosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Accurate sex identification is necessary for research (e.g., developmental, population, and evolutionary studies), management of wildlife species, and improvement of captive breeding programmes both for conservation and poultry (Morinha et al, 2012). Several methods have been developed to identify the sex of birds, based on cytogenetic markers (Griffiths & Phil, 2000; Harris & Walters, 1982), identification of sex‐specific differences in morphometric characters (Reynolds et al, 2008; Cappello & Boersma, 2018; Medeiros et al, 2019; Alonso et al, 2019; Seyer et al, 2020) and behaviour (Gray & Hamer, 2001), including vocalization (Volodin et al, 2009), measurement of hormone levels (Bercovitz et al, 1978) and laparoscopy for gonad inspection (Richner, 1989). However, many of these methods have limited applications, because they are time‐consuming, technically demanding (e.g., cytogenetics, morphometrics), potentially harmful (e.g., laparoscopy), or error‐prone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%