1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.68052170.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatographic Discrimination of Soluble Neuropathy Target Esterase Isoenzymes and Related Phenyl Valerate Esterases from Chicken Brain, Spinal Cord, and Sciatic Nerve

Abstract: Neuropathy target esterase (NTE) activity is operatively defined in this work as the phenyl valerate esterase (PVase) activity resistant to 40 ,aM paraoxon but sensitive to 250~eMmipafox. Gel filtration chromatography with Sephacryl S-300 of the soluble fraction from spinal cord showed two PVase peaks containing NTE activity (S-NTE1 and S-NTE2). The titration curve corre-.sponding to inhibition by mipafox was studied over the 1 -250 ,uM range, in the presence of 40 ,..tM paraoxon. The data revealed that S-NTE1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both sensitive components (EI and EII) showed spontaneous reactivation after the inhibition with paraoxon (Estévez et al 2011), EI is permanently inhibited with S9B, and EII is spontaneously reactivated after the inhibition with S9B (Estévez et al 2010). The component EI might be related to the so-called soluble NTE (Escudero et al 1997) because it is permanently inhibited with mipafox, S9B and PMSF but it is spontaneously reactivated after the inhibition by paraoxon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both sensitive components (EI and EII) showed spontaneous reactivation after the inhibition with paraoxon (Estévez et al 2011), EI is permanently inhibited with S9B, and EII is spontaneously reactivated after the inhibition with S9B (Estévez et al 2010). The component EI might be related to the so-called soluble NTE (Escudero et al 1997) because it is permanently inhibited with mipafox, S9B and PMSF but it is spontaneously reactivated after the inhibition by paraoxon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The function of NTE-R1 is unknown, although it may be related to esterase activities in different fractions of hen brain and sciatic nerves [30][31][32] . Our results clearly show that Nte-R1 cannot substitute for Nte during embryonic development and that it is not responsible for the effects of EOPF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the possibility that S-NTE2 could be a proteolytic product of P-NTE is unlikely; the incubation of brain membranes (containing large amounts of P-NTE) with sciatic nerve homogenates did not increase the NTE recovered in soluble fractions (data not shown). However, from previously published observations on S-NTE separation of S-NTEI and S-NTE2 (Escudero et al, 1997), it was deduced that S-NTE1 could constitute membrane material that can be solubilized at pH 8 but not at lower pH values. As the enriched preparation of S-NTE2 comes from a peak in Sephacryl S-300 of~100 kDa molecular mass, the native protein is likely to be a dimer.…”
Section: Although Two Apparent Soluble Nte Froms S-nte1mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, S-NTE1 and S-NTE2 can be discriminated by both physical chromatographic separation and by sensitivity to mipafox. It was subsequently observed in several tissues that S-NTE1 is a form detected in soluble fraction prepared at pH 8.0 (Escudero et al, 1997). That S-NTE1 is not obtained at pH 6.8 and that its sensitivity to mipafox is similar to that of P-NTE suggest that it is a membrane component partly solubilized at higher pH values and is derived either from P-NTE or from some other, similar membrane protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%