2008
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200800075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatographic analysis of banned antibacterial growth promoters in animal feed

Abstract: The issue of antimicrobial use in animals used as food is of global concern. Antimicrobials are used in animal agriculture to improve health and welfare of animals, meat quality, the economic efficiency of growth and production and public health by decreasing shedding of zoonotic pathogens. However, large quantities are often used without professional supervision. The growth-promotant (now reclassified as zootechnical feed additives) effect of low levels of antibiotics in animal feeds was first described in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the international epidemiologic implications, the World Health Organization recommended careful usage of antimicrobial agents in food animals. The European Union countries have banned the use of antimicrobials for growth promotion in food animals since 1999 (28), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration suggested a guideline for use of antimicro bials in 2010 (32), marking a significant readjustment in the conduct of AMR surveillance in food animals in the world and in the use of antimicrobial agents. However, many of the data are conflicting, details on species of cattle are lacking, and AMR bacteria from beef cattle in Japan have not been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the international epidemiologic implications, the World Health Organization recommended careful usage of antimicrobial agents in food animals. The European Union countries have banned the use of antimicrobials for growth promotion in food animals since 1999 (28), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration suggested a guideline for use of antimicro bials in 2010 (32), marking a significant readjustment in the conduct of AMR surveillance in food animals in the world and in the use of antimicrobial agents. However, many of the data are conflicting, details on species of cattle are lacking, and AMR bacteria from beef cattle in Japan have not been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Feed Additive Regulation 1831=2003=EC) describes the total ban on antibiotics as growth promoters. [1][2][3] The reason for the global concern about the consumption of low levels of antimicrobial residues in aquatic foods is the fact that these residues may potentially have hazardous effects on human health if present in edible tissues. [1][2]4] Fluoroquinolones are used both in human and veterinary medicine, being active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria through the inhibition of their DNA gyrase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of the proposed method are the speed, the ease of the clean-up protocol, and the low cost of the needed instrumentation, rendering it highly applicable to the feed industry. a limited number of analytical protocols for feeds has been published (Samanidou and Evaggelopoulou, 2008). The methods investigating feed premixes are mainly based on enzyme-linked immuneabsorbent assays, ELISAs (Jimenez et al, 2009), or high performance liquid chromatography methods, combined or not, with tandem mass spectrometry (Croubels et al, 2002;Boscher et al, 2010;Lopes et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%