2005
DOI: 10.1007/11599517_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing Appropriate Peer-to-Peer Infrastructure for Your Digital Libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our approach, the allocation of documents to clusters is done by classification, it is not unsupervised, and clusters are not hierarchical. We believe that current research in P2P digital libraries [1,6,11] can benefit from the merits of our approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to our approach, the allocation of documents to clusters is done by classification, it is not unsupervised, and clusters are not hierarchical. We believe that current research in P2P digital libraries [1,6,11] can benefit from the merits of our approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key issues in this process are [9]: the system architecture and the information access means. With respect to system architecture, peer-to-peer (P2P) is identified as a topic of primary interest, as P2P architectures allow for loosely-coupled integration of information services and sharing of information/knowledge [1,6,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Web search [100,109,9,37] • Digital libraries [35,112,93,34,67] • Distributed image retrieval [140,43,74] • P2P databases [62,121]…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%