Choosing a Cluster Sampling Design for Lot Quality Assurance Sampling Surveys

Abstract

Lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) surveys are commonly used for monitoring and evaluation in resource-limited settings. Recently several methods have been proposed to combine LQAS with cluster sampling for more timely and cost-effective data collection. For some of these methods, the standard binomial model can be used for constructing decision rules as the clustering can be ignored. For other designs, considered here, clustering is accommodated in the design phase. In this paper, we compare these latter cluster LQAS methodologies and provide recommendations for choosing a cluster LQAS design. We compare technical differences in the three methods and determine situations in which the choice of method results in a substantively different design. We consider two different aspects of the methods: the distributional assumptions and the clustering parameterization. Further, we provide software tools for implementing each method and clarify misconceptions about these designs in the literature. We illustrate the differences in these methods using vaccination and nutrition cluster LQAS surveys as example designs. The cluster methods are not sensitive to the distributional assumptions but can result in substantially different designs (sample sizes) depending on the clustering parameterization. However, none of the clustering parameterizations used in the existing methods appears to be consistent with the observed data, and, consequently, choice between the cluster LQAS methods is not straightforward. Further research should attempt to characterize clustering patterns in specific applications and provide suggestions for best-practice cluster LQAS designs on a setting-specific basis.

A Multicountry Comparison of Three Coverage Evaluation Survey Sampling Methodologies for Neglected Tropical Diseases

“…Sampling 19 households, as opposed to 19 individuals, would constitute a "cluster LQAS" sampling design. 33 Although this design may be worth considering for future surveys, it was deemed impractical in this instance because the need to account for clustering in the analysis would make it hard to interpret the LQAS decision rules. As a consequence of selecting only one individual per household, individuals living in larger households had a lower probability of selection than those living in households with fewer residents.…”

Monitoring maternal, newborn, and child health interventions using lot quality assurance sampling in Sokoto State of northern Nigeria

“…Data were collected through a rigorous multistage random sampling of 19 LQAS locations (villages) in each of the 23 local government areas (LGAs) (SA or Lots). In each year, 19 households were randomly selected from the sampled villages (totaling 437 households, combining to 874 in the 2 years) in the state catchment area – using probability proportionate to population size – considered a ‘self-weighing’ sampling design ( 20 , 21 ). A household was defined as groups of persons who ate from the same cooking pot.…”

Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio

“…y finalmente otras más pequeñas, como escuelas, consultorios, hogares (una vez elegido esta unidad, se aplica el instrumento de medición a todos sus integrantes). Si se desea realizar un estudio de prevalencia o una encuesta en habitantes de una localidad, el muestreo aleatorio simple es complejo y de alto costo, ya que estudiar una muestra de tamaño "n", supone enviar encuestadores a "x" puntos diferentes de la misma; de tal forma que en cada uno de estos puntos, sólo se aplicará una encuesta (Hund et al, 2015). Por ello, es que en este tipo de casos se sugiere aplicar muestreo por conglomerados, pues son más económicos y eficientes.…”