1996
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/18.4.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chondroectodermal dysplasia (Ellis-van Creveld syndrome): a case report

Abstract: A case of chondroectodermal dysplasia (Ellis-van Creveld syndrome) with a remarkable number of the classic oral and dental changes is described. This syndrome involves all embryonic tissue layers and is polysymptomatic; yet some oral and dental manifestations are pathognomonic and must be considered in primary diagnostic criteria. However, in some patients, these oral and dental manifestations are not clinically evident leading to misdiagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the reports on the function of EVC and EVC2 at the molecular level and the wide spectrum of clinical presentations in EvC patients, the existing documentations of the craniofacial manifestations of EvC syndrome are quite inconsistent. For example, the enlarged skull, depressed nasal bridge, mandibular prognathism characteristic of skeletal class III growth, and skeletal open bite are reported in several cases of EvC patients (Ellis and van Creveld, 1940;Goor et al, 1965;Susami et al, 1999), while other reports indicated that facial development is normal (Varela and Ramos, 1996;Hanemann et al, 2010). These inconsistencies are possibly due to a large variation in the patients' genetic background and/ or the limited information on the craniofacial abnormalities in EvC patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the reports on the function of EVC and EVC2 at the molecular level and the wide spectrum of clinical presentations in EvC patients, the existing documentations of the craniofacial manifestations of EvC syndrome are quite inconsistent. For example, the enlarged skull, depressed nasal bridge, mandibular prognathism characteristic of skeletal class III growth, and skeletal open bite are reported in several cases of EvC patients (Ellis and van Creveld, 1940;Goor et al, 1965;Susami et al, 1999), while other reports indicated that facial development is normal (Varela and Ramos, 1996;Hanemann et al, 2010). These inconsistencies are possibly due to a large variation in the patients' genetic background and/ or the limited information on the craniofacial abnormalities in EvC patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not show racial and gender predilection. [1,11,12] Prenatal abnormalities would be expected after the 18 th week of gestation that includes narrow thorax, marked shortening of long bones, hands and feet hexadactyly and cardiac defect. [13] The cardinal features after birth are increasing severity from the proximal to distal portions of the limbs with disproportionate small stature, shortening of middle and distal phalanges, hands aff ected with polydactyly, nails and teeth dysplasia, congenital heart malformations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical variability of oral EVC syndrome which is attributed to genetic and environmental phenotype modifying eff ects could be due to genetic factor on teeth and other oral structure development that occurs during a relatively long period. [9,12] Confi rmatory diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations of the syndrome, skeletal radiographic survey. DNA mapping is most reliable molecular diagnostic methods by direct sequencing of EVC and EVC2 genes, [13] however gene mapping was not attempted in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 It is a syndrome affecting the Amish population of Pennsylvania in USA with the prevalence rate of 1/5,000 live birth. In nonAmish population, the birth prevalence is 7/1,000,000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%