2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-017-2678-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesky Factorization-Based Parallel Factor for Azimuth and Elevation Angles Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SHO applies the EVD with all the 2M+1 columns, while HOP uses only K columns to calculate propagators, which can greatly improve the computational efficiency. However, this improvement is at the cost of reduced estimation precision [30]. When the SNR became bigger than 15 dB, the two methods performed similarly, and the negative effect of the proposed method could be negligible.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SHO applies the EVD with all the 2M+1 columns, while HOP uses only K columns to calculate propagators, which can greatly improve the computational efficiency. However, this improvement is at the cost of reduced estimation precision [30]. When the SNR became bigger than 15 dB, the two methods performed similarly, and the negative effect of the proposed method could be negligible.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propagator-based methods require neither singular-value decomposition (SVD) nor EVD [29,30]. Considering the high degrees of freedom and resistance to colored Gaussian noise of a high-order cumulant, we propose a high-order propagator method that requires only one matrix and no EVD, therefore significantly reducing the computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose two DOA estimation techniques based on LDL and Cholesky factorization for hardware implementation. Both Cholesky and LDL have been shown [26]- [28] to have low computational cost as they do not require either EVD or SVD. They require O(N 3 /6) flops while EVD/SVD-based methods require O(N 3 ) flops, where N is the dimension of the data matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%